Michael S. Mahoney
- Theoretical Computer Science top 1%
- History and Theory of Mathematics 9
-
- History of Science and Medicine 3
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 2
-
- History of Computing Technologies 10
- Anthropology top 10%
- Historical and Literary Studies 4
- Conservation top 10%
-
- Logic, programming, and type systems 2
-
- Mathematics and Applications 2
-
- History and Developments in Astronomy 2
- Co-authors
- Donald GilliesWilliam AsprayRichard S. WestfallAbdel-Badeeh M. SalemIvo SchneiderD. T. WhitesideAlexander MurrayOphir Frieder
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Michael S. Mahoney
31 papers receiving 356 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Theoretical Computer Science 84
- History and Philosophy of Science 151
- Computer Science Applications 123
- Anthropology 48
- Conservation 14
Countries citing papers authored by Michael S. Mahoney
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael S. Mahoney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael S. Mahoney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael S. Mahoney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael S. Mahoney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael S. Mahoney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael S. Mahoney. The network helps show where Michael S. Mahoney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Michael S. Mahoney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 9 | Software history | 2003 | 1 |
| 10 | Fusion of Information Retrieval Engines (FIRE) | 2002 | 4 |
| 11 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 64 | |
| 13 | The roots of software engineering | 1990 | 15 |
| 14 | 1990 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 21 | |
| 18 | 1980 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 55 | |
| 20 | 1968 | 23 |
About Michael S. Mahoney
Michael S. Mahoney is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Computer Science Applications, having authored 36 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Computing Technologies (10 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (9 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (2 papers), Mathematics and Applications (2 papers) and History and Developments in Astronomy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (84 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (151 citations) and Computer Science Applications (123 citations). Michael S. Mahoney has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Donald Gillies, William Aspray, Richard S. Westfall, Abdel-Badeeh M. Salem, Ivo Schneider, D. T. Whiteside, Alexander Murray, Ophir Frieder, Nathan Sivin and Jean Ε. Sammet. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Physics Today and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.