D. T. Whiteside
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Theoretical Computer Science top 0.5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 10%
- Topics
- Historical Philosophy and Science (10 papers)History and Theory of Mathematics (9 papers)History and Developments in Astronomy (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth SudanUnited States
In The Last Decade
D. T. Whiteside
28 papers receiving 350 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- History and Philosophy of Science 197
- Theoretical Computer Science 152
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 97
- Anthropology 87
- Geometry and Topology 51
Countries citing papers authored by D. T. Whiteside
This map shows the geographic impact of D. T. Whiteside's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. T. Whiteside with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. T. Whiteside more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D. T. Whiteside
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. T. Whiteside. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. T. Whiteside. The network helps show where D. T. Whiteside may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. T. Whiteside
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. T. Whiteside. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. T. Whiteside based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. T. Whiteside. D. T. Whiteside is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | The preliminary manuscripts for Isaac Newton's 1687 Principia, 1684-1685 : facsimiles of the original autographs, now in Cambridge University Library, with an introduction | 3 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | The Mathematical Papers. Vol. VI | 1 |
| 11 | The mathematical principles underlying Newton's Principia mathematica : being the ninth Gibson lecture in the history of mathematics delivered within the University of Glasgow on 21st October 1969 | 1 |
| 12 | The mathematical papers of Isaac Newton | 200 |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | The mathematical works of Isaac Newton | 35 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | TRAMP (TRACKING AND MATCHING PROGRAM) | 2 |
| 20 | 2 |
About D. T. Whiteside
D. T. Whiteside is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (10 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (9 papers) and History and Developments in Astronomy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (152 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (197 citations) and Anthropology (87 citations). D. T. Whiteside has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Isaac Newton, Michael Hoskin, Michael S. Mahoney and Julian W. Gardner. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physics Today and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.