William Kneale
Impact in
- Theoretical Computer Science top 1%
- History and Theory of Mathematics
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
Papers in
- Philosophy 10
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 3
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 1
- Co-authors
- Martha KnealeP. T. GeachGeorge BooleJean PiagetNorman KretzmannA. N. PriorDesmond Paul HenryG. P. Henderson
- Journals
- The Philosophical Quarterly (13 papers)The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (4 papers)Mind (3 papers)The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Philosophy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
William Kneale
29 papers receiving 700 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Theoretical Computer Science 76
- History and Philosophy of Science 258
- Philosophy 357
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 237
- General Psychology 20
Countries citing papers authored by William Kneale
This map shows the geographic impact of William Kneale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Kneale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Kneale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William Kneale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Kneale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Kneale. The network helps show where William Kneale may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside William Kneale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1972 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1971 | 13 | |
| 3 | 1971 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1970 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1969 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1969 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1968 | 24 | |
| 8 | 1966 | 34 | |
| 9 | 1965 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1963 | 1 | |
| 11 | The Development of Logic Hit paper breakdown → | 1962 | 565 |
| 12 | 1962 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1961 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1957 | 9 | |
| 15 | 1956 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1954 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1953 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1952 | 28 | |
| 19 | 1952 | 27 | |
| 20 | 1951 | 1 |
About William Kneale
William Kneale is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Religious studies, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper) and Philosophy, Science, and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (76 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (258 citations), Philosophy (357 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (237 citations) and General Psychology (20 citations). William Kneale has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martha Kneale, P. T. Geach, George Boole, Jean Piaget, Norman Kretzmann, A. N. Prior, Desmond Paul Henry, G. P. Henderson, John Wisdom and A. H. Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Mind, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.