Thomas O. Nelson

12.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
113 papers, 7.1k citations indexed

About

Thomas O. Nelson is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas O. Nelson has authored 113 papers receiving a total of 7.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 31 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 28 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Thomas O. Nelson's work include Memory Processes and Influences (49 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (19 papers) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (13 papers). Thomas O. Nelson is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (49 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (19 papers) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (13 papers). Thomas O. Nelson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Thomas O. Nelson's co-authors include John Dunlosky, Louis Narens, R. Jacob Leonesio, Giuliana Mazzoni, Seth Chaiklin, John T. Jost, Arie W. Kruglanski, Richard Gonzalez, Kenneth J. Malmberg and Colin M. MacLeod and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, American Psychologist and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Thomas O. Nelson

109 papers receiving 6.6k citations

Hit Papers

A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeli... 1984 2026 1998 2012 1984 1996 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas O. Nelson United States 43 4.6k 2.8k 2.1k 1.5k 988 113 7.1k
Lyle E. Bourne United States 39 3.5k 0.8× 3.0k 1.1× 2.0k 1.0× 1.5k 1.0× 1.3k 1.3× 168 7.6k
Robert S. Lockhart Canada 16 4.1k 0.9× 2.9k 1.0× 2.3k 1.1× 1.1k 0.8× 1.1k 1.1× 29 7.7k
Michael E. J. Masson Canada 41 5.9k 1.3× 3.0k 1.1× 2.2k 1.1× 843 0.6× 1.7k 1.8× 147 8.2k
Geoffrey R. Loftus United States 40 6.0k 1.3× 1.7k 0.6× 2.1k 1.0× 753 0.5× 1.6k 1.6× 118 8.8k
Kevin Dunbar United States 33 2.8k 0.6× 1.8k 0.7× 1.9k 0.9× 690 0.5× 830 0.8× 52 5.5k
James H. Neely United States 31 5.6k 1.2× 3.4k 1.2× 2.1k 1.0× 994 0.7× 1.2k 1.2× 71 7.3k
Lynne M. Reder United States 45 3.6k 0.8× 2.6k 0.9× 1.5k 0.7× 1.3k 0.9× 1.2k 1.2× 126 7.2k
Benton J. Underwood United States 47 4.9k 1.1× 3.5k 1.2× 2.4k 1.2× 1.8k 1.2× 1.5k 1.5× 179 9.5k
Gail McKoon United States 61 8.7k 1.9× 4.2k 1.5× 3.3k 1.6× 1.9k 1.3× 1.2k 1.2× 146 12.4k
Robert L. Solso United States 18 3.0k 0.6× 1.9k 0.7× 1.8k 0.9× 761 0.5× 867 0.9× 69 5.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas O. Nelson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas O. Nelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas O. Nelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas O. Nelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas O. Nelson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas O. Nelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas O. Nelson. The network helps show where Thomas O. Nelson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas O. Nelson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas O. Nelson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas O. Nelson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas O. Nelson. Thomas O. Nelson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dougherty, Michael R., et al.. (2005). Using the past to predict the future. Memory & Cognition. 33(6). 1096–1115. 58 indexed citations
2.
Nelson, Thomas O.. (2003). Relevance of unjustified strong assumptions when utilizing signal detection theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 26(3). 351–351. 2 indexed citations
3.
Meeter, Martijn & Thomas O. Nelson. (2003). Multiple study trials and judgments of learning. Acta Psychologica. 113(2). 123–132. 31 indexed citations
4.
Malmberg, Kenneth J. & Thomas O. Nelson. (2003). The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis. Memory & Cognition. 31(1). 35–43. 70 indexed citations
5.
Dunlosky, John, et al.. (1998). Inhalation of 30% nitrous oxide impairs people's learning without impairing people's judgments of what will be remembered.. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 6(1). 77–86. 16 indexed citations
6.
Gonzalez, Richard & Thomas O. Nelson. (1996). Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores.. Psychological Bulletin. 119(1). 159–165. 66 indexed citations
7.
Mazzoni, Giuliana & Thomas O. Nelson. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 21(5). 1263–1274. 103 indexed citations
8.
Nelson, Thomas O.. (1993). Judgments of learning and the allocation of study time.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 122(2). 269–273. 37 indexed citations
9.
Nelson, Thomas O., et al.. (1993). Failure to obtain a generation effect during naturalistic learning. Memory & Cognition. 21(3). 361–366. 11 indexed citations
10.
Dunlosky, John & Thomas O. Nelson. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition. 20(4). 374–380. 243 indexed citations
11.
Nelson, Thomas O.. (1992). Metacognition : core readings. Allyn and Bacon eBooks. 210 indexed citations
12.
Jameson, Kimberly A., et al.. (1990). The influence of near-threshold priming on metamemory and recall. Acta Psychologica. 73(1). 55–68. 32 indexed citations
13.
Nelson, Thomas O., et al.. (1990). Cognition and metacognition at extreme altitudes on Mount Everest.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 119(4). 367–374. 58 indexed citations
14.
Leonesio, R. Jacob & Thomas O. Nelson. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 16(3). 464–470. 165 indexed citations
15.
Nelson, Thomas O. & R. Jacob Leonesio. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect.". Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 14(4). 676–686. 228 indexed citations
16.
Nelson, Thomas O.. (1986). BASIC programs for computation of the Goodman-Kruskal gamma coefficient. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 24(4). 281–283. 15 indexed citations
17.
Nelson, Thomas O.. (1985). Ebbinghaus's contribution to the measurement of retention: Savings during relearning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 11(3). 472–479. 24 indexed citations
18.
Nelson, Thomas O., et al.. (1984). Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 113(2). 282–300. 28 indexed citations
19.
Nelson, Thomas O. & Seth Chaiklin. (1980). Immediate memory for spatial location.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory. 6(5). 529–545. 29 indexed citations
20.
Nelson, Thomas O. & Colin M. MacLeod. (1974). Fluctuations in recall across successive test trials. Memory & Cognition. 2(4). 687–690. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026