Aidan Feeney

2.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
79 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Aidan Feeney is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Aidan Feeney has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in General Decision Sciences, 31 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 16 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Aidan Feeney's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (37 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (29 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers). Aidan Feeney is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (37 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (29 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers). Aidan Feeney collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Aidan Feeney's co-authors include Jonathan J. Rolison, Teresa McCormack, Salissou Moutari, Shirley Regev, Evan Heit, Jean‐François Bonnefon, Simon J. Handley, Eoin Travers, Sarah R. Beck and Gaëlle Villejoubert and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Child Development and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Aidan Feeney

74 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

What are the factors that contribute to road accidents? A... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Aidan Feeney United Kingdom 19 450 371 306 253 240 79 1.5k
Ian Dennis United Kingdom 27 421 0.9× 106 0.3× 646 2.1× 470 1.9× 457 1.9× 69 2.5k
Joshua Rubinstein United States 9 363 0.8× 175 0.5× 959 3.1× 396 1.6× 473 2.0× 16 2.0k
Jeffrey E. Evans United States 7 181 0.4× 143 0.4× 972 3.2× 298 1.2× 341 1.4× 8 1.7k
Michael Schulte‐Mecklenbeck Switzerland 18 70 0.2× 522 1.4× 386 1.3× 231 0.9× 256 1.1× 36 1.6k
Friedrich Wilkening Switzerland 19 662 1.5× 271 0.7× 489 1.6× 280 1.1× 338 1.4× 33 1.6k
Jaap Ham Netherlands 28 111 0.2× 80 0.2× 462 1.5× 1.2k 4.6× 218 0.9× 106 2.2k
Timo Mäntylä Sweden 29 338 0.8× 180 0.5× 1.4k 4.4× 316 1.2× 891 3.7× 75 2.3k
Joseph G. Johnson United States 22 409 0.9× 604 1.6× 468 1.5× 420 1.7× 290 1.2× 35 1.9k
John V. McDonnell United States 6 235 0.5× 118 0.3× 527 1.7× 236 0.9× 363 1.5× 10 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Aidan Feeney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aidan Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aidan Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aidan Feeney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aidan Feeney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aidan Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aidan Feeney. The network helps show where Aidan Feeney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aidan Feeney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aidan Feeney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aidan Feeney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aidan Feeney. Aidan Feeney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ellefson, Michelle R., et al.. (2025). The roles of switching and inhibition in adult counterintuitive scientific thinking. Cognition. 268. 106377–106377.
2.
FitzGibbon, Lily, et al.. (2024). Experience of regret is unaffected by concurrent working memory load. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 3–3.
3.
McCormack, Teresa, et al.. (2024). Testicular self‐examination: The role of anticipated relief and anticipated regret. British Journal of Health Psychology. 30(1). e12756–e12756. 1 indexed citations
4.
McCormack, Teresa, et al.. (2023). Do both anticipated relief and anticipated regret predict decisions about influenza vaccination?. British Journal of Health Psychology. 29(1). 134–148. 4 indexed citations
5.
McCormack, Teresa, et al.. (2022). Relief in everyday life.. Emotion. 23(7). 1844–1868. 8 indexed citations
6.
McCormack, Teresa, et al.. (2021). From Brexit to Biden: What Responses to National Outcomes Tell Us About the Nature of Relief. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 13(7). 1095–1104. 7 indexed citations
7.
Regev, Shirley, Jonathan J. Rolison, Aidan Feeney, & Salissou Moutari. (2017). Driver distraction is an under-reported cause of road accidents: An examination of discrepancy between police officers’ views and road accident reports. UCL Discovery (University College London). 9 indexed citations
8.
Travers, Eoin & Aidan Feeney. (2013). Diverse evidence for dissociable processes in inductive reasoning. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 1474–1479. 1 indexed citations
9.
Feeney, Aidan, et al.. (2012). Do children who experience regret make better decisions? A developmental study of the behavioral consequences of regret.. Cognitive Science. 2 indexed citations
10.
Feeney, Aidan, et al.. (2012). The inductive potential of religion categories in Northern Ireland.. Cognitive Science. 34(34). 2351–2357. 2 indexed citations
11.
McCormack, Teresa, et al.. (2011). The development of regret. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 111(1). 120–127. 44 indexed citations
12.
Bonnefon, Jean‐François, Wim De Neys, & Aidan Feeney. (2011). Processing scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 3389–3395. 9 indexed citations
13.
Feeney, Aidan, et al.. (2010). The Effects of Domain and Type of Knowledge on Category-Based Inductive Reasoning. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 32(32). 3 indexed citations
14.
Feeney, Aidan, et al.. (2007). Do development and learning really decrease memory? On similarity and category-based induction in adults and children. Cognition. 106(3). 1451–1464. 18 indexed citations
15.
Feeney, Aidan. (2007). How many processes underlie category-based induction? Effects of conclusion specificity and cognitive ability. Memory & Cognition. 35(7). 1830–1839. 22 indexed citations
16.
Feeney, Aidan, et al.. (2006). Dual Processes, Development, and Scalar Implicature. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 28(28). 774–779. 1 indexed citations
17.
Feeney, Aidan & Simon J. Handley. (2006). Comparisons mental models, comparisons, and the action effect in judgements of regret.. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 359(22). 2393–4; author reply 2394. 8 indexed citations
18.
Hadjichristidis, Constantinos, Rosemary J. Stevenson, David E. Over, et al.. (2001). On the Evaluation of If p then q Conditionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 23(23). 381–386. 22 indexed citations
19.
Feeney, Aidan, et al.. (2000). A rarity heuristic for hypothesis testing. Conference Cognitive Science. 22(22). 119–124. 1 indexed citations
20.
Feeney, Aidan, et al.. (1997). Probabilities, utilities and hypothesis testing. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast). 217–222. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026