Michael Potter

62 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Michael Potter
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • History and Philosophy of Science 327
  • Theoretical Computer Science 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 521
  • Philosophy 328
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 276
Replace David Wallace with:
David Wallace United States
Jeremy Butterfield United Kingdom
Philipp Frank Germany
Craig Callender United States
Michael Redhead United Kingdom
Lawrence Sklar United States
Jürgen Renn Germany
Paul Teller United States
Robert Schulmann Germany
Max Jammer Israel
Michael Potter relative to David Wallace United States David Wallace's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
David Wallace · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Potter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Potter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Potter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Potter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Potter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Potter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Potter. The network helps show where Michael Potter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Potter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Potter Line = papers co-authored together Michael Potter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993449
2 1996136
3 200495
4 200160
5 202253
6 201453
7 200045
8 199934
9 200034
10 199132
11 198631
12 201529
13 199129
14 199822
15 201018
16
Forced Labour in Northern Ireland: exploiting vulnerability
201118
17 200918
18 199918
19 200115
20 200214

About Michael Potter

Michael Potter is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Instrumentation, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (9 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (9 papers), Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (8 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (7 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (6 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (5 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (327 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (54 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (521 citations), Philosophy (328 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (276 citations). Michael Potter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Lewis, Jennifer Hamilton, Philip D. Rack, Michael M. Shara, A. F. J. Moffat, Bertrand Russell, Wounjhang Park, Eric S. Perlman, M. Elvis and C. M. Urry. Their work appears in journals such as The Astronomical Journal, The Philosophical Quarterly, Europe Asia Studies, The Astrophysical Journal and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact