Paul Teller

3.5k citations
62 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 20

Paul Teller

60 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Paul Teller
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • History and Philosophy of Science 799
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 361
  • Philosophy 304
  • Theoretical Computer Science 24
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 495
Replace Lawrence Sklar with:
Lawrence Sklar United States
Huw Price Australia
Craig Callender United States
Tim Maudlin United States
Robert W. Batterman United States
Barry Loewer United States
Michael Redhead United Kingdom
Mauricio Suárez Spain
Paul Humphreys United States
Stathis Psillos Greece
Paul Teller relative to Lawrence Sklar United States Lawrence Sklar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Lawrence Sklar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Teller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Teller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Teller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Teller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Teller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Teller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Teller. The network helps show where Paul Teller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Paul Teller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Teller Line = papers co-authored together Paul Teller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20202
2 20187
3 20162
4 201011
5 20096
6 200430
7 200418
8 2001168
9 199124
10 19906
11 19843
12 198313
13 19807
14 19772
15
Shimony's a priori arguments for tempered personalism
19752
16 197524
17 19740
18 19745
19 19741
20 197234

About Paul Teller

Paul Teller is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Theoretical Computer Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (24 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (19 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (6 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers) and Art, Technology, and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (799 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (361 citations), Philosophy (304 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (24 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (495 citations). Paul Teller has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Redhead, Eugen Merzbacher, Richard W. Miller, Peter Achinstein, Arthur Fine, Bas C. van Fraassen, Jenann Ismael, Michael Weisberg, Nancy Cartwright and Ronald N. Giere. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, The Philosophical Review, Synthese, The Journal of Philosophy and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026