Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Rossby Centre Regional Climate model RCA3: model description and performance
2010541 citationsPatrick Samuelsson, Colin Jones et al.Tellus A Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanographyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ulf Hansson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulf Hansson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulf Hansson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulf Hansson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulf Hansson. The network helps show where Ulf Hansson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulf Hansson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulf Hansson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulf Hansson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ulf Hansson. Ulf Hansson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hansson, Ulf, et al.. (2013). Whatever happened to Integrated Education. 47–62.3 indexed citations
8.
Hansson, Ulf, et al.. (2013). Integrated education: a review of policy and research evidence 1999-2012.19 indexed citations
9.
O'Connor, Úna & Ulf Hansson. (2012). Capacity Building for Inclusion: The Role and Contribution of Special Needs Assistants and Classroom Assistants in Ireland and Northern Ireland.. Dalarna University College Electronic Archive.2 indexed citations
10.
Hamilton, Jennifer, et al.. (2011). Forced Labour in Northern Ireland: exploiting vulnerability. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast).18 indexed citations
Walsh, Judy, et al.. (2007). Enabling lesbian, gay and bisexual individuals to access their rights under equality law. Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin).1 indexed citations
13.
Hansson, Ulf. (2007). Chiang Ching-Kuo A Motive Analysis. Lund University Publications Student Papers (Lund University).1 indexed citations
14.
Hansson, Ulf. (2005). A globolo gems. Late Etrusco-Italic scarab intaglios. Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University).2 indexed citations
Räisänen, Jouni, Ulf Hansson, Anders Ullerstig, et al.. (2003). GCM driven simulations of recent and future climate with the Rossby Centre coupled atmosphere - Baltic Sea regional climate model RCAO. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).62 indexed citations
Döscher, Ralf, Ulrika Willén, Colin Jones, et al.. (2002). The development of the coupled regional ocean-atmosphere model RCAO. Boreal environment research. 183–192.111 indexed citations
Rummukainen, Markku, Jouni Räisänen, Anders Ullerstig, et al.. (1997). RCA - Rossby Centre regional Atmospheric climate model: model description and results from the first multi-year simulation. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.