Michael Peters
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 0.5%
- Automotive Engineering top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- John T. ManningBruno LaengLutz JänckeMark JacksonKeziah LathamConnor D. RichardsonStian ReimersChristian Battista
- Topics
- Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (56 papers)Motor Control and Adaptation (29 papers)Spatial Cognition and Navigation (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Peters
109 papers receiving 5.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 166
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.2k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.2k
- Automotive Engineering 1.2k
- Social Psychology 945
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 938
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Peters
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Peters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Peters
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Peters. The network helps show where Michael Peters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Peters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Peters. Michael Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 64 | |
| 3 | 165 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 198 | |
| 6 | 223 | |
| 7 | 90 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 48 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 152 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 70 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | The Right-Brained Indian: Fact or Fiction?. | 8 |
About Michael Peters
Michael Peters is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Developmental Biology, having authored 110 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (56 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (29 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (3.2k citations), Automotive Engineering (1.2k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.2k citations). Michael Peters has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John T. Manning, Bruno Laeng, Lutz Jäncke, Mark Jackson, Keziah Latham, Connor D. Richardson, Stian Reimers, Christian Battista, N. Jon Shah and Jean Choi. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Psychological Bulletin and Journal of Applied Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.