Richard A. Lippa
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Gender Studies top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- John‐Paul MulilisSharon ConnellyRay BlanchardMarcia L. CollaerMichael PetersThomas Shelley DuvalQazi RahmanJohn A. Penner
- Topics
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies (27 papers)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (16 papers)LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard A. Lippa
68 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Sociology and Political Science 1.6k
- Gender Studies 1.5k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.5k
- Social Psychology 1.5k
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Richard A. Lippa
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard A. Lippa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard A. Lippa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard A. Lippa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard A. Lippa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard A. Lippa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard A. Lippa. The network helps show where Richard A. Lippa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard A. Lippa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard A. Lippa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard A. Lippa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard A. Lippa. Richard A. Lippa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | 165 | |
| 6 | 161 | |
| 7 | 149 | |
| 8 | 90 | |
| 9 | 127 | |
| 10 | 73 | |
| 11 | 86 | |
| 12 | 99 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 154 | |
| 15 | 158 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 93 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 92 |
About Richard A. Lippa
Richard A. Lippa is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 4.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (27 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (16 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.5k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.5k citations) and Social Psychology (1.5k citations). Richard A. Lippa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John‐Paul Mulilis, Sharon Connelly, Ray Blanchard, Marcia L. Collaer, Michael Peters, Thomas Shelley Duval, Qazi Rahman, John A. Penner, Kathleen S. J. Preston and John C. Loehlin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.