Daniel Voyer

8.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
121 papers, 6.2k citations indexed

About

Daniel Voyer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Automotive Engineering and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Voyer has authored 121 papers receiving a total of 6.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 49 papers in Automotive Engineering and 34 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Daniel Voyer's work include Spatial Cognition and Navigation (49 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (36 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers). Daniel Voyer is often cited by papers focused on Spatial Cognition and Navigation (49 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (36 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (23 papers). Daniel Voyer collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Daniel Voyer's co-authors include Susan D. Voyer, M. Philip Bryden, Ashley E. Thompson, Jean Saint‐Aubin, Julianne Imperato‐McGinley, Petra Jansen, Albert Postma, M. P. Bryden, Xing Huang and Nora S. Newcombe and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, NeuroImage and Journal of Educational Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Voyer

116 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Hit Papers

Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta... 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 2014 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Voyer Canada 32 2.6k 2.1k 1.8k 1.5k 986 121 6.2k
Rossana De Béni Italy 37 1.2k 0.5× 2.1k 1.0× 2.2k 1.2× 1.9k 1.3× 695 0.7× 172 5.6k
María Kozhevnikov United States 26 1.6k 0.6× 1.4k 0.7× 943 0.5× 1.0k 0.7× 627 0.6× 69 4.2k
Susan D. Voyer Canada 11 1.5k 0.6× 1.2k 0.6× 890 0.5× 822 0.6× 568 0.6× 14 3.8k
Francesca Pazzaglia Italy 33 1.5k 0.6× 953 0.5× 770 0.4× 1.0k 0.7× 475 0.5× 112 3.3k
Anne C. Petersen United States 21 1.8k 0.7× 1.7k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 929 0.6× 1.2k 1.2× 34 7.0k
Cesare Cornoldi Italy 50 990 0.4× 2.3k 1.1× 3.8k 2.1× 3.8k 2.6× 697 0.7× 289 8.4k
F.J. Langdon United Kingdom 19 1.6k 0.6× 703 0.3× 795 0.4× 1.1k 0.8× 466 0.5× 34 4.0k
Susan C. Levine United States 61 2.0k 0.8× 3.1k 1.5× 1.6k 0.9× 5.6k 3.8× 1.5k 1.5× 179 13.0k
Michael Peters Canada 40 1.2k 0.5× 938 0.5× 3.2k 1.8× 1.2k 0.8× 945 1.0× 110 5.9k
Priti Shah United States 35 607 0.2× 3.6k 1.8× 3.7k 2.0× 2.5k 1.7× 860 0.9× 90 8.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Voyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Voyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Voyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Voyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Voyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Voyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Voyer. The network helps show where Daniel Voyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Voyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Voyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Voyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Voyer. Daniel Voyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jansen, Petra, et al.. (2024). Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation: A replication. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 32(3). 1204–1216. 1 indexed citations
2.
Aubanel, Eric, et al.. (2023). Investigating the Progression of Programmers' Mental Models. 639–639.
3.
Huang, Xing & Daniel Voyer. (2017). Timing and sex effects on the “Spatial Orientation Test”: A World War II map reading test. Spatial Cognition and Computation. 17(4). 251–272. 3 indexed citations
4.
Harding, Jennifer & Daniel Voyer. (2015). Laterality effects in cross-modal affective priming. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 21(4-6). 585–605. 4 indexed citations
5.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2015). Item type, occlusion, and gender differences in mental rotation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 69(8). 1530–1544. 9 indexed citations
6.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2014). Spatial Abilities and Aging: A Meta-Analysis. Experimental Aging Research. 40(4). 395–425. 75 indexed citations
7.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2011). Response format, magnitude of laterality effects, and sex differences in laterality. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 17(3). 259–274. 5 indexed citations
8.
Voyer, Daniel. (2010). Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 18(2). 267–277. 138 indexed citations
9.
Voyer, Daniel & David B. Boles. (2007). Fixation and attention control in lateralised target detection and free recall with words. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 12(5). 428–448. 4 indexed citations
10.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2007). Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 14(1). 23–38. 195 indexed citations
11.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2006). The Home Disadvantage: Examination of the Self-Image Redefinition Hypothesis. Journal of sport behavior. 29(3). 270. 4 indexed citations
12.
Butler, Tracy, Julianne Imperato‐McGinley, Hong Pan, et al.. (2006). Sex differences in mental rotation: Top–down versus bottom–up processing. NeuroImage. 32(1). 445–456. 105 indexed citations
13.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2005). Material type and attention control in dichotic listening. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 10(5). 441–455. 3 indexed citations
14.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2005). Attention, reliability, and validity of perceptual asymmetries in the fused dichotic words test. Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition. 10(6). 545–561. 16 indexed citations
15.
Voyer, Daniel. (2004). Reliability and magnitude of laterality effects in dichotic listening with exogenous cueing. Brain and Cognition. 55(3). 495–496. 3 indexed citations
16.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2002). On the Reliability of Laterality Effects in a Dichotic Emotion Recognition Task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 24(5). 605–614. 19 indexed citations
17.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2001). Reliability and Magnitude of Auditory Laterality Effects: The Influence of Attention. Brain and Cognition. 46(3). 397–413. 32 indexed citations
18.
Voyer, Daniel, et al.. (2001). Gender Differences in Laterality on a Dichotic Task: The Influence of Report Strategies. Cortex. 37(3). 345–362. 6 indexed citations
19.
Voyer, Daniel. (1998). On the Reliability and Validity of Noninvasive Laterality Measures. Brain and Cognition. 36(2). 209–236. 53 indexed citations
20.
Wright, Edward F., et al.. (1995). Supporting Audiences and Performance under Pressure: The Home-Ice Disadvantage in Hockey Championships. Journal of sport behavior. 18(1). 21–28. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026