Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Syntax and Semantics Volume 3: Speech Acts
1976390 citationsMichael L. Geis, Peter Cole et al.Modern Language Journalprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Geis
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Geis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Geis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Geis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Geis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Geis. The network helps show where Michael L. Geis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael L. Geis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael L. Geis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael L. Geis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael L. Geis. Michael L. Geis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Geis, Michael L.. (2014). Notes on the Riemannian Geometry of Lie Groups. Rose-Hulman Scholar (Rose–Hulman Institute of Technology). 15(2). 5.1 indexed citations
Geis, Michael L., Christoph Flamm, Michael T. Wolfinger, et al.. (2008). Folding Kinetics of Large RNAs. Journal of Molecular Biology. 379(1). 160–173.64 indexed citations
Condon, Sherri & Michael L. Geis. (1998). Dynamic Speech Act Theory. American Speech. 73(2). 218–218.
6.
Geis, Michael L.. (1995). The Meaning of Meaning in the Law. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 73(3). 1125–1144.1 indexed citations
Geis, Michael L., et al.. (1988). The language of conversation.1 indexed citations
11.
Geis, Michael L.. (1987). The Language of Politics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.51 indexed citations
12.
Geis, Michael L.. (1986). Language and Media. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 7. 64–73.1 indexed citations
13.
Geis, Michael L.. (1985). The Syntax of Conditional Sentences. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).11 indexed citations
14.
Geis, Michael L.. (1985). Studies in generalized phrase structure grammar. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
15.
Beniger, James R. & Michael L. Geis. (1984). The Language of Television Advertising.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 13(1). 73–73.73 indexed citations
Geis, Michael L., Peter Cole, & Jerry L. Morgan. (1976). Syntax and Semantics Volume 3: Speech Acts. Modern Language Journal. 60(5/6). 301–301.390 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Geis, Michael L.. (1975). What Do Place Adverbials Modify. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).2 indexed citations
19.
Geis, Michael L.. (1975). Two Theories of Action Sentences. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).1 indexed citations
20.
Geis, Michael L., et al.. (1971). On Invited Inferences. The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).240 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.