Michael Johnstone

116 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Michael Johnstone
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 318
  • Developmental Neuroscience 85
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 63
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 235
  • Linguistics and Language 36
Replace Dennis B. Gillings with:
Dennis B. Gillings United States
Ulrich Grouven Germany
Jie Xu China
D. Ryan Cook United States
Patrick Tighe United States
Christian Kern Switzerland
Bill Byrom United Kingdom
James M. Davis United States
Mark van Gils Finland
Michael Johnstone relative to Dennis B. Gillings United States Dennis B. Gillings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Dennis B. Gillings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Johnstone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Johnstone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Johnstone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Johnstone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Johnstone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Johnstone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Johnstone. The network helps show where Michael Johnstone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Johnstone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Johnstone Line = papers co-authored together Michael Johnstone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1956128
2 195999
3 201681
4 198564
5 202047
6 196146
7 198443
8 199642
9 198140
10 196635
11 197034
12 197633
13 196431
14 201828
15 201327
16 199424
17 202123
18 201523
19 197223
20 201821

About Michael Johnstone

Michael Johnstone is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Management Science and Operations Research and History, having authored 125 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (23 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (18 papers), Medical History and Innovations (12 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (8 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (8 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (318 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (85 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (63 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (235 citations) and Linguistics and Language (36 citations). Michael Johnstone has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Doug Creighton, Saeid Nahavandi, Steven Allender, Douglas G. Tincello, D P Fossard, Joshua Hayward, Kayla de la Haye, Cindy Gallois, Victor J. Callan and Abbas Khosravi. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anaesthesia, BMC Public Health, Postgraduate Medical Journal and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact