Bill Byrom

1.7k citations
56 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 17

Bill Byrom

53 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Bill Byrom
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Applied Psychology 78
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 78
  • Statistics and Probability 104
  • Family Practice 14
  • Physiology 163
Replace Yaping Chang with:
Yaping Chang Canada
Latha Ganti United States
Adelin Albert Belgium
William Whang United States
Munyaradzi Dimairo United Kingdom
Laura Flight United Kingdom
Chia‐Ju Lin Taiwan
Michael L. Cohen United States
Menelaos Pavlou United Kingdom
Alexander Kaizer United States
Bill Byrom relative to Yaping Chang Canada Yaping Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Yaping Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bill Byrom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bill Byrom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bill Byrom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bill Byrom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bill Byrom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bill Byrom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bill Byrom. The network helps show where Bill Byrom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bill Byrom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bill Byrom Line = papers co-authored together Bill Byrom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20242
3 20231
4 20236
5 20230
6 20225
7 202223
8 20224
9 202129
10 20206
11 20181
12 201822
13 201816
14 201753
15 201713
16 201737
17 201658
18 20161
19
Clinical Trials & Regulatory Affairs Managing the Medication Supply Chain Process Using Clinical Technology Solutions
20051
20 20003

About Bill Byrom

Bill Byrom is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Health, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (12 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (9 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers) and Social Media in Health Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (78 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (78 citations), Statistics and Probability (104 citations), Family Practice (14 citations) and Physiology (163 citations). Bill Byrom has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Willie Muehlhausen, Marie Mc Carthy, David A. Rowe, Michael G. Hutchison, Oliver N. Keene, L.F. Lacey, John McKellar, Alison Carr, Philip Breedon and Francesco Luke Siena. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, Contemporary Clinical Trials, Journal of Medical Systems and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026