Michael J. Schnieders

5.2k citations
52 papers · 3.3k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 23

Michael J. Schnieders

48 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field2010202620152020201020182505007501000

Peers

Michael J. Schnieders
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Molecular Biology 1.8k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Materials Chemistry 881
  • Spectroscopy 465
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 436
Replace Morten Ø. Jensen with:
Morten Ø. Jensen Denmark
H. Peter Lu United States
Jianhan Chen United States
Dirk Gillespie United States
Serdar Kuyucak Australia
Indira H. Shrivastava United States
Yun Luo United States
Christopher A. Reynolds United Kingdom
Changbong Hyeon South Korea
Albert C. Pan United States
Michael J. Schnieders relative to Morten Ø. Jensen Denmark Morten Ø. Jensen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Morten Ø. Jensen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Schnieders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Schnieders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Schnieders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Schnieders more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Schnieders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Schnieders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Schnieders. The network helps show where Michael J. Schnieders may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Schnieders

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Schnieders. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Schnieders based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Schnieders. Michael J. Schnieders is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 2
4 2
5 6
6 10
7 37
8 74
9 19
10 46
11 56
12 19
13 134
14 85
15 16
16 22
17
Current Status of the AMOEBA Polarizable Force Fieldbreakdown →
1096
18 11
19 81
20 60

About Michael J. Schnieders

Michael J. Schnieders is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Structural Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 52 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (20 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (12 papers) and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (436 citations), Sensory Systems (202 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations). Michael J. Schnieders has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Pengyu Ren, Jay W. Ponder, Vijay S. Pande, Jean‐Philip Piquemal, Louis Lagardère, Chuanjie Wu, Gary N. I. Clark, Martin Head‐Gordon, Imran S. Haque and Margaret E. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026