Jay W. Ponder
- Molecular Biology top 0.5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 0.5%
- Materials Chemistry top 1%
- Spectroscopy top 0.2%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Pengyu RenFrederic M. RichardsDavid A. CaseChuanjie WuMichael J. SchniedersTeresa Head‐GordonVijay S. PandeAlan Grossfield
- Topics
- Protein Structure and Dynamics (39 papers)Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (30 papers)Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (20 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
Jay W. Ponder
84 papers receiving 11.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Molecular Biology 6.6k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 4.6k
- Materials Chemistry 3.3k
- Spectroscopy 1.8k
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Jay W. Ponder
This map shows the geographic impact of Jay W. Ponder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay W. Ponder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay W. Ponder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jay W. Ponder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay W. Ponder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay W. Ponder. The network helps show where Jay W. Ponder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jay W. Ponder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jay W. Ponder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jay W. Ponder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jay W. Ponder. Jay W. Ponder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 70 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Force Fields for Protein Simulationsbreakdown → | 1478 |
| 18 | 480 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 46 |
About Jay W. Ponder
Jay W. Ponder is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 86 papers that have together received 12.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (39 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (30 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.5k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (4.6k citations) and Spectroscopy (1.8k citations). Jay W. Ponder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Pengyu Ren, Frederic M. Richards, David A. Case, Chuanjie Wu, Michael J. Schnieders, Teresa Head‐Gordon, Vijay S. Pande, Alan Grossfield, Jean‐Philip Piquemal and M. Dudek. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.