Robert E. Duke

1.0k total citations
17 papers, 593 citations indexed

About

Robert E. Duke is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology and Hematology. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert E. Duke has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 593 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Hematology. Recurrent topics in Robert E. Duke's work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers) and Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (5 papers). Robert E. Duke is often cited by papers focused on Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers) and Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (5 papers). Robert E. Duke collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and France. Robert E. Duke's co-authors include David S. Cerutti, Terry P. Lybrand, Thomas A. Darden, G. Andrés Cisneros, Peter L. Freddolino, Lee G. Pedersen, David A. Case, Jean‐Philip Piquemal, L. Perera and Guohui Li and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

In The Last Decade

Robert E. Duke

16 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Robert E. Duke United States 13 336 162 142 59 58 17 593
John Z. H. Zhang China 10 290 0.9× 81 0.5× 107 0.8× 68 1.2× 27 0.5× 17 413
Chang G. Ji China 11 315 0.9× 82 0.5× 105 0.7× 65 1.1× 26 0.4× 15 421
Taras V. Pogorelov United States 19 1.0k 3.0× 283 1.7× 171 1.2× 107 1.8× 86 1.5× 47 1.4k
Mikolai Fajer United States 11 352 1.0× 143 0.9× 110 0.8× 78 1.3× 14 0.2× 19 486
Arjun Saha United States 17 345 1.0× 226 1.4× 174 1.2× 84 1.4× 45 0.8× 40 902
John C. Faver United States 17 565 1.7× 172 1.1× 164 1.2× 75 1.3× 93 1.6× 24 862
Canan Baysal Türkiye 14 466 1.4× 100 0.6× 179 1.3× 76 1.3× 29 0.5× 29 614
Ikuo Fukuda Japan 17 532 1.6× 261 1.6× 170 1.2× 130 2.2× 82 1.4× 45 834
Hannes G. Wallnoefer Austria 11 260 0.8× 47 0.3× 79 0.6× 37 0.6× 37 0.6× 13 413
Philippe Cuniasse France 19 625 1.9× 70 0.4× 89 0.6× 41 0.7× 23 0.4× 31 968

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Duke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Duke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Duke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Duke. The network helps show where Robert E. Duke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert E. Duke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert E. Duke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert E. Duke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert E. Duke. Robert E. Duke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Ren, Pengyu, Guohui Li, Michael J. Schnieders, et al.. (2020). Trypsin-ligand binding free energies from explicit and implicit solvent simulations with polarizable potential. UNC Libraries.
2.
Duke, Robert E. & G. Andrés Cisneros. (2019). Ewald-based methods for Gaussian integral evaluation: application to a new parameterization of GEM*. Journal of Molecular Modeling. 25(10). 307–307. 13 indexed citations
3.
Duke, Robert E., et al.. (2016). Long-range electrostatic corrections in multipolar/polarizable QM/MM simulations. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts. 135(7). 28 indexed citations
4.
Fang, Dong, Robert E. Duke, & G. Andrés Cisneros. (2015). A new smoothing function to introduce long-range electrostatic effects in QM/MM calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 143(4). 44103–44103. 25 indexed citations
5.
Duke, Robert E., et al.. (2014). GEM*: A Molecular Electronic Density-Based Force Field for Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 10(4). 1361–1365. 63 indexed citations
6.
Elking, Dennis M., L. Perera, Robert E. Duke, Thomas A. Darden, & Lee G. Pedersen. (2011). A finite field method for calculating molecular polarizability tensors for arbitrary multipole rank. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 32(15). 3283–3295. 21 indexed citations
7.
Chandrasekaran, V., et al.. (2010). Recent Estimates of the Structure of the Factor VIIa (FVIIa)/Tissue Factor (TF) and Factor Xa (FXa) Ternary Complex. Thrombosis Research. 125. S7–S10. 10 indexed citations
8.
Elking, Dennis M., L. Perera, Robert E. Duke, Thomas A. Darden, & Lee G. Pedersen. (2010). Atomic forces for geometry‐dependent point multipole and Gaussian multipole models. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 31(15). 2702–2713. 19 indexed citations
9.
Cerutti, David S., Peter L. Freddolino, Robert E. Duke, & David A. Case. (2010). Simulations of a Protein Crystal with a High Resolution X-ray Structure: Evaluation of Force Fields and Water Models. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 114(40). 12811–12824. 72 indexed citations
10.
Jiao, Dian, Jiajing Zhang, Robert E. Duke, et al.. (2009). Trypsin‐ligand binding free energies from explicit and implicit solvent simulations with polarizable potential. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 30(11). 1701–1711. 81 indexed citations
11.
Chandrasekaran, V., Chang Jun Lee, Ping Lin, Robert E. Duke, & Lee G. Pedersen. (2009). A computational modeling and molecular dynamics study of the Michaelis complex of human protein Z-dependent protease inhibitor (ZPI) and factor Xa (FXa). Journal of Molecular Modeling. 15(8). 897–911. 12 indexed citations
12.
Cerutti, David S., Robert E. Duke, Thomas A. Darden, & Terry P. Lybrand. (2009). Staggered Mesh Ewald: An Extension of the Smooth Particle-Mesh Ewald Method Adding Great Versatility. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 5(9). 2322–2338. 132 indexed citations
13.
Lin, Ping, V. Chandrasekaran, Robert E. Duke, et al.. (2008). Proposed structural models of human factor Va and prothrombinase. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 6(1). 83–89. 20 indexed citations
14.
Chandrasekaran, V., et al.. (2008). Computational study of the putative active form of protein Z (PZa): Sequence design and structural modeling. Protein Science. 17(8). 1354–1361. 4 indexed citations
15.
Cerutti, David S., Robert E. Duke, Peter L. Freddolino, Hao Fan, & Terry P. Lybrand. (2008). A Vulnerability in Popular Molecular Dynamics Packages Concerning Langevin and Andersen Dynamics. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 4(10). 1669–1680. 71 indexed citations
16.
Perera, L., et al.. (2004). Early Unfolding Response of a Stable Protein Domain to Environmental Changes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 108(45). 9834–9840. 2 indexed citations
17.
Venkateswarlu, D., Robert E. Duke, L. Perera, Tom Darden, & Lee G. Pedersen. (2003). An all-atom solution-equilibrated model for human extrinsic blood coagulation complex (sTF–VIIa–Xa): a protein–protein docking and molecular dynamics refinement study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 1(12). 2577–2588. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026