Michael J. Peeters

1.4k total citations
69 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Michael J. Peeters is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Peeters has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 21 papers in Education and 18 papers in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Peeters's work include Innovations in Medical Education (44 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (18 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers). Michael J. Peeters is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (44 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (18 papers) and Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers). Michael J. Peeters collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Michael J. Peeters's co-authors include Brenda L. Gleason, Tyan Thomas, Beth H. Resman‐Targoff, Samantha Karr, Kristi W. Kelley, Tina Harrach Denetclaw, Sarah McBane, Beth A. Martin, Juan C. Sarria and Svetlana A. Beltyukova and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation and Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Peeters

60 papers receiving 957 citations

Peers

Michael J. Peeters

PHEOH

EDUCA

GHP

Cindy D. Stowe United States

Marianne McCollum United States

Stephanie Y. Crawford United States

Yazed AlRuthia Saudi Arabia

James Galipeau Canada

Kelly R. Ragucci United States

Dianne Davis United States

David S. Fike United States

Josette Jones United States

Maggi Banning United Kingdom

Cindy D. Stowe United States

Michael J. Peeters

824 ×1.8

PHEOH

380 ×1.0

EDUCA

496 ×2.8

GHP

403 ×3.2

78 ×0.6

Citations per year, relative to Michael J. Peeters Michael J. Peeters (= 1×) peers Cindy D. Stowe

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Peeters

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Peeters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Peeters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Peeters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Peeters

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Peeters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Peeters. The network helps show where Michael J. Peeters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Peeters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Peeters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Peeters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Peeters. Michael J. Peeters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Peeters, Michael J., et al.. (2025). Comparing Holistic and Mixed-Approach Rubrics for Academic Poster Quality. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 89(4). 101379–101379.

Peeters, Michael J., Wade Lee‐Smith, David D. Allen, & Christopher Giuliano. (2025). Academic conference posters: A systematic review. INNOVATIONS in pharmacy. 16(3).

Giuliano, Christopher, Michael J. Peeters, & Wade Lee‐Smith. (2024). Academic Conference Posters: A Systematic Review of Rubrics. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 88(9). 100865–100865. 2 indexed citations

Peeters, Michael J., et al.. (2024). Academic conference posters: Describing visual impression in pharmacy education. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 13. 100423–100423. 4 indexed citations

Gallegos, Patrick J., et al.. (2024). Leadership and Followership in Health Professions: A Systematic Review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15(2). 2–2. 1 indexed citations

Peeters, Michael J., et al.. (2023). Using Rasch measurement for instrument rating scale refinement. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 15(1). 110–118. 8 indexed citations

Peeters, Michael J., et al.. (2023). Interprofessional education workshop for prescription drug monitoring programs. Medical Education. 57(11). 1161–1162. 1 indexed citations

Castleberry, Ashley N. & Michael J. Peeters. (2023). Identifying and analyzing likert scales. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 15(10). 923–924. 1 indexed citations

Peeters, Michael J.. (2021). A Teachable Moment Matters for: Striving for inter-rater reliability with a patient counseling assessment rubric: Lessons learned. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 13(8). 1073–1077. 2 indexed citations

10.

Peeters, Michael J.. (2021). Moving beyond Cronbach’s Alpha and Inter-Rater Reliability: A Primer on Generalizability Theory for Pharmacy Education. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 12(1). 14–14. 9 indexed citations

11.

Baki, Gabriella & Michael J. Peeters. (2019). Exploring the Impact of Technology Use with Cosmetic Science Guest-Speakers: A Qualitative Study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(2). 13–13.

12.

Peeters, Michael J. & Spencer E. Harpe. (2019). Updating conceptions of validity and reliability. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 16(8). 1127–1130. 15 indexed citations

13.

Peeters, Michael J., et al.. (2016). Development of Critical Thinking in Pharmacy Education. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 18 indexed citations

14.

Peeters, Michael J. & Sai H. S. Boddu. (2016). Assessing development in critical thinking: One institution’s experience. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 8(3). 271–278. 13 indexed citations

15.

Peeters, Michael J., et al.. (2015). Comparing Vertical and Horizontal Screening Methods for Pharmacy Resident Candidates Before Interviews. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(3). 2 indexed citations

16.

Jung, Rose, et al.. (2013). Educational Testing Validity and Reliability in Pharmacy and Medical Education Literature. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 77(10). 213–213. 13 indexed citations

17.

Peeters, Michael J., et al.. (2010). A Standardized Rubric to Evaluate Student Presentations. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 74(9). 171–171. 28 indexed citations

18.

Peeters, Michael J., et al.. (2009). A Computer-based Module for Prescribing Error Instruction. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 73(6). 101–101.

19.

Peeters, Michael J.. (2007). Education Regarding Medication Order Errors. The Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 60(2). 1 indexed citations

20.

Water, A. Van de, W. Loots, Bruno Van Deuren, et al.. (2005). A new method to calculate the beat-to-beat instability of QT duration in drug-induced long QT in anesthetized dogs. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods. 52(1). 168–177. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact