Michael J. Annear
Impact in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Papers in
-
- Nursing education and management 3
- Co-authors
- Claire EcclestonAndrew RobinsonChristine ToyeFrances McInerneyKate-Ellen ElliottBruce TranterAndrew L. RobinsonEmma Lea
- Journals
- BMC Geriatrics (3 papers)Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (2 papers)Australasian Journal on Ageing (2 papers)Health Expectations (2 papers)Journal of Interprofessional Care (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaJapanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael J. Annear
30 papers receiving 801 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 79
- Psychiatry and Mental health 417
- Research and Theory 23
- General Health Professions 484
- Family Practice 28
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Annear
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Annear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Annear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Annear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Annear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Annear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Annear. The network helps show where Michael J. Annear may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Annear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 141 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 46 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 118 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 98 |
About Michael J. Annear
Michael J. Annear is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Family Practice and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (14 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (10 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (5 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers) and Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (79 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (417 citations), Research and Theory (23 citations), General Health Professions (484 citations) and Family Practice (28 citations). Michael J. Annear has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claire Eccleston, Andrew Robinson, Christine Toye, Frances McInerney, Kate-Ellen Elliott, Bruce Tranter, Andrew L. Robinson, Emma Lea, Amanda Lo and T. F. Hartley. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Geriatrics, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Australasian Journal on Ageing, Health Expectations and Journal of Interprofessional Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.