Emma Lea
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 2%
Papers in
-
- Nursing education and management 9
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research 6
- Co-authors
- Anthony WorsleyDavid CrawfordAndrew RobinsonClaire EcclestonAnnette MarlowFran McInerneyMichael J. AnnearSharon Andrews
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Nursing (6 papers)British Food Journal (4 papers)Appetite (4 papers)European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2 papers)Public Health Nutrition (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomIran
In The Last Decade
Emma Lea
54 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Research and Theory 107
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 106
- Marketing 469
- Food Science 599
- Ecology 705
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Lea
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Lea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Lea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Lea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Lea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Lea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Lea. The network helps show where Emma Lea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Lea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 17 | |
| 10 | Modelling Connections In Aged Care Report on Stages 1 - 3 | 2008 | 3 |
| 11 | 2007 | 178 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 185 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 148 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 38 | |
| 16 | What proportion of South Australian adult non-vegetarians hold similar beliefs to vegetarians? | 2004 | 11 |
| 17 | The promise of plant based foods - new directions? | 2003 | 4 |
| 18 | 2003 | 161 | |
| 19 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 51 |
About Emma Lea
Emma Lea is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, General Health Professions and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (22 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (13 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (11 papers), Nursing education and management (9 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (8 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (6 papers) and Culinary Culture and Tourism (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (107 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (106 citations), Marketing (469 citations), Food Science (599 citations) and Ecology (705 citations). Emma Lea has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Worsley, David Crawford, Andrew Robinson, Claire Eccleston, Annette Marlow, Fran McInerney, Michael J. Annear, Sharon Andrews, Paul Turner and Carolyn Emden. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, British Food Journal, Appetite, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Public Health Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.