Emma Lea

2.8k total citations
56 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Emma Lea is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Lea has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in General Health Professions, 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 13 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Emma Lea's work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (22 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (13 papers) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (11 papers). Emma Lea is often cited by papers focused on Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (22 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (13 papers) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (11 papers). Emma Lea collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Iran. Emma Lea's co-authors include Anthony Worsley, David Crawford, Andrew Robinson, Claire Eccleston, Annette Marlow, Fran McInerney, Michael J. Annear, Sharon Andrews, Paul Turner and Carolyn Emden and has published in prestigious journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Appetite and European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

In The Last Decade

Emma Lea

54 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Lea Australia 23 705 599 570 469 420 56 2.1k
Cristina Mora Italy 25 270 0.4× 541 0.9× 425 0.7× 482 1.0× 473 1.1× 71 2.5k
Julia A. Wolfson United States 32 278 0.4× 493 0.8× 341 0.6× 138 0.3× 1.9k 4.6× 131 3.5k
Ramona Robinson‐O’Brien United States 13 177 0.3× 209 0.3× 380 0.7× 128 0.3× 1.7k 4.1× 15 2.5k
Chery Smith United States 34 137 0.2× 329 0.5× 659 1.2× 292 0.6× 1.9k 4.6× 89 3.8k
Jennifer Jabs United States 6 185 0.3× 294 0.5× 180 0.3× 101 0.2× 562 1.3× 6 1.1k
Flora Douglas United Kingdom 16 333 0.5× 212 0.4× 96 0.2× 82 0.2× 496 1.2× 69 1.5k
Cristina Godinho Portugal 18 332 0.5× 312 0.5× 98 0.2× 92 0.2× 335 0.8× 78 1.3k
Rachel Pechey United Kingdom 24 197 0.3× 228 0.4× 102 0.2× 166 0.4× 854 2.0× 67 1.6k
Elena Serrano United States 26 97 0.1× 371 0.6× 279 0.5× 133 0.3× 1.3k 3.0× 125 2.2k
Jeanne P. Goldberg United States 28 148 0.2× 493 0.8× 311 0.5× 291 0.6× 2.8k 6.6× 90 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Lea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Lea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Lea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Lea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Lea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Lea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Lea. The network helps show where Emma Lea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Lea

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Lea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Lea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Lea. Emma Lea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Lea, Emma, Andrew Robinson, & Kathleen Doherty. (2023). Relationship Between Dementia Knowledge and Occupational Strain Among Staff of Residential Facilities for Older Adults: A Cross-sectional Survey. Ageing International. 48(4). 1221–1237. 3 indexed citations
3.
Lea, Emma, Andrew Robinson, & Kathleen Doherty. (2023). From residential aged care worker to Dementia Care Support Worker: a qualitative study of senior aged care staff perceptions of the role. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 40(4). 1 indexed citations
4.
Lea, Emma, et al.. (2015). Residential Aged Care Facility Clinical Placements for Undergraduate Paramedic Students: An Evaluation of the Australian Experience. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 12. 1–9. 6 indexed citations
5.
Lea, Emma, Sharon Andrews, Terry Haines, et al.. (2015). Developing networks between residential aged care facilities as a result of engagement in a falls prevention project: an action research study. Contemporary Nurse. 52(2-3). 163–175. 2 indexed citations
6.
Lea, Emma, Sharon Andrews, Keith Hill, et al.. (2012). Beyond the ‘tick and flick’: facilitating best practice falls prevention through an action research approach. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 21(13-14). 1896–1905. 16 indexed citations
7.
Nitz, Jennifer, Elizabeth Cyarto, Sharon Andrews, et al.. (2011). Outcomes from the Implementation of a Facility-Specific Evidence-Based Falls Prevention Intervention Program in Residential Aged Care. Geriatric Nursing. 33(1). 41–50. 29 indexed citations
8.
Robinson, Andrew, et al.. (2008). Information issues for providers of services to people with dementia living in the community in Australia: breaking the cycle of frustration. Health & Social Care in the Community. 17(2). 141–150. 19 indexed citations
9.
Robinson, Andrew L., et al.. (2008). Multiple views reveal the complexity of dementia diagnosis. Australasian Journal on Ageing. 27(4). 183–188. 17 indexed citations
10.
Robinson, AL, Christine Toye, Brian Abbey, et al.. (2008). Modelling Connections In Aged Care Report on Stages 1 - 3. UTAS Research Repository. 3 indexed citations
11.
Lea, Emma & Anthony Worsley. (2007). Australian consumers’ food-related environmental beliefs and behaviours. Appetite. 50(2-3). 207–214. 178 indexed citations
12.
Lea, Emma, et al.. (2006). Farmers’ and Consumers’ Beliefs About Community-Supported Agriculture in Australia: A Qualitative Study. Ecology of Food and Nutrition. 45(2). 61–86. 24 indexed citations
13.
Lea, Emma, David Crawford, & Anthony Worsley. (2006). Public views of the benefits and barriers to the consumption of a plant-based diet. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 60(7). 828–837. 185 indexed citations
14.
Lea, Emma, David Crawford, & Anthony Worsley. (2005). Consumers' readiness to eat a plant-based diet. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 60(3). 342–351. 148 indexed citations
15.
Anderson, Annie S., et al.. (2005). Evolution of atherogenic diets in South Asian and Italian women after migration to a higher risk region. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 18(1). 33–43. 38 indexed citations
16.
Lea, Emma & Anthony Worsley. (2004). What proportion of South Australian adult non-vegetarians hold similar beliefs to vegetarians?. Nutrition & Dietetics. 61(1). 11–21. 11 indexed citations
17.
Lea, Emma. (2003). The promise of plant based foods - new directions?. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 55(10). 467–472. 4 indexed citations
18.
Lea, Emma & Anthony Worsley. (2003). Benefits and barriers to the consumption of a vegetarian diet in Australia. Public Health Nutrition. 6(5). 505–511. 161 indexed citations
19.
Lea, Emma & Anthony Worsley. (2002). Are information sources associated with Australians' beliefs about the necessity of meat?. Ecology of Food and Nutrition. 41(5). 441–461. 3 indexed citations
20.
Lea, Emma & Anthony Worsley. (2002). The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat. Public Health Nutrition. 5(1). 37–45. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026