Jeff Jordan
- Philosophy top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Topics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil (14 papers)Free Will and Agency (5 papers)Medieval Philosophy and Theology (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSocial Cognitive and Affective NeurosciencePhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jeff Jordan
26 papers receiving 190 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Philosophy 144
- Cognitive Neuroscience 77
- Social Psychology 45
- Sociology and Political Science 34
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 28
Countries citing papers authored by Jeff Jordan
This map shows the geographic impact of Jeff Jordan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeff Jordan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeff Jordan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jeff Jordan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeff Jordan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeff Jordan. The network helps show where Jeff Jordan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jeff Jordan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jeff Jordan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jeff Jordan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jeff Jordan. Jeff Jordan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Wagering on an Ironic God: Pascal on Faith and Philosophy | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | Comparing Tobacco Control Social Media Strategies to Reach Youth | 1 |
| 7 | Philosophy of religion : the key thinkers | 2 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | Blocking Rowe's New Evidential Argument from Evil | 1 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Pragmatic arguments and belief | 8 |
| 18 | Gambling on God : essays on Pascal's wager | 21 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Jeff Jordan
Jeff Jordan is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (14 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (144 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (77 citations). Jeff Jordan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Howard‐Snyder, Liat Levita, Patrick Johnston, William A. Anthony and Dana E. Wagner. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.