Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis.

886 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 886 indexed citations. Written by Maike Luhmann, Wilhelm Hofmann, Michael Eid and Richard E. Lucas covering the research area of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (537 citations), Clinical Psychology (255 citations) and Health (236 citations). Published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1037/a0025948 →

Countries where authors are citing Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/a0025948.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026