Michael E. Pierce
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis 7
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 4
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 4
- Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives 3
- Virology top 10%
- Pharmaceutical Science top 5%
-
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis 3
-
- HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment 6
-
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 4
- Biochemical and Molecular Research 3
- Co-authors
- John V. DunciaJoseph B. SantellaDavid J. CariniGregory J. WellsWilliam A. PricePaul E. AldrichAndrew T. ChiuA.L. Johnson
- Journals
- Tetrahedron Letters (6 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (4 papers)Organic Process Research & Development (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael E. Pierce
28 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Organic Chemistry 764
- Virology 59
- Pharmaceutical Science 75
- Inorganic Chemistry 70
- Infectious Diseases 93
Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Pierce
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Pierce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Pierce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Pierce. The network helps show where Michael E. Pierce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 54 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 29 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 51 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 274 | |
| 18 | 1991 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 20 | Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: the discovery of a series of N-(biphenylylmethyl)imidazoles as potent, orally active antihypertensivesbreakdown → | 1991 | 369 |
About Michael E. Pierce
Michael E. Pierce is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (7 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (6 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (4 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (3 papers), Synthesis of Tetrazole Derivatives (3 papers) and Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (764 citations), Virology (59 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (75 citations). Michael E. Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John V. Duncia, Joseph B. Santella, David J. Carini, Gregory J. Wells, William A. Price, Paul E. Aldrich, Andrew T. Chiu, A.L. Johnson, Joseph Fortunak and Pat N. Confalone. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Organic Process Research & Development, Pharmaceutical Research and Separation Science and Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.