Michael Dieter

523 citations
18 papers · 217 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Dieter

15 papers receiving 196 citations

Peers

Michael Dieter
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Communication 39
  • Human-Computer Interaction 28
  • Computer Science Applications 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 113
  • Music 5
Replace Alberto Romele with:
Alberto Romele France
Miriam E. Sweeney United States
David Golumbia United States
Dan Perkel United States
Tanja Sihvonen Finland
Joan M. Cherry Canada
Elizabeth Van Couvering Sweden
Myron Tuman United States
Christina Dunbar-Hester United States
Julian Dibbell
Michael Dieter relative to Alberto Romele France Alberto Romele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Alberto Romele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Dieter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Dieter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Dieter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Dieter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Dieter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Dieter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Dieter. The network helps show where Michael Dieter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Dieter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Dieter Line = papers co-authored together Michael Dieter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2019100
2 201538
3 200312
4 201912
5 202112
6 20248
7 20148
8
The Patterning of Finance/Security: A Designerly Walkthrough of Challenger Banking Apps
20208
9 20187
10 20225
11
New aesthetic, new anxieties
20122
12
In the shadows of the digital humanities
20141
13 20231
14 20091
15 20181
16 20191
17
FCJ-126 The Becoming Environmental of Power: Tactical Media After Control
20110
18 20200

About Michael Dieter

Michael Dieter is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Literature and Literary Theory and Information Systems, having authored 18 papers that have together received 217 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cybernetics and Technology in Society (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers), Digital Media and Philosophy (2 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (2 papers) and Digital Economy and Work Transformation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (39 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (28 citations), Computer Science Applications (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (113 citations) and Music (5 citations). Michael Dieter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nathaniel Tkacz, Anne Helmond, Fernando van der Vlist, Esther Weltevrede, David M. Berry, Carolin Gerlitz, David Gauthier, Annette L. Valenta, W. B. Panko and Rosemary Walker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Systems, New Media & Society, Social Media + Society, Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies and differences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact