David Golumbia
- Sociology and Political Science
- Information Systems top 10%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Management Information Systems
- Computer Science Applications
- Co-authors
- Rita RaleyMichael DieterElizabeth WeedEllen RooneyPatrick JagodaBrian LennonWendy Hui Kyong ChunRichard Grusin
- Topics
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers)Digital Humanities and Scholarship (3 papers)Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Computer Science ApplicationsHistory and Philosophy of ScienceLiterature and Literary Theory
- Partner nations
- United StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
David Golumbia
21 papers receiving 149 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Sociology and Political Science 79
- Information Systems 46
- Literature and Literary Theory 32
- Management Information Systems 22
- Computer Science Applications 18
Countries citing papers authored by David Golumbia
This map shows the geographic impact of David Golumbia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Golumbia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Golumbia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Golumbia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Golumbia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Golumbia. The network helps show where David Golumbia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Golumbia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Golumbia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Golumbia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Golumbia. David Golumbia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | In the shadows of the digital humanities | 1 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About David Golumbia
David Golumbia is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and Cultural Studies, having authored 29 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (3 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (18 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (14 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations). David Golumbia has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Rita Raley, Michael Dieter, Elizabeth Weed, Ellen Rooney, Patrick Jagoda, Brian Lennon, Wendy Hui Kyong Chun, Richard Grusin, Alexander R. Galloway and Naomi Schor. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Language and Hypatia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.