A. P. Martinich
- Philosophy top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Xiao YangDavid SosaS. A. LloydStephen Darwall
- Topics
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (18 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers)Political Theology and Sovereignty (4 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewThe Philosophical ReviewPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
A. P. Martinich
36 papers receiving 282 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Philosophy 241
- Political Science and International Relations 116
- Sociology and Political Science 116
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 84
- History and Philosophy of Science 43
Countries citing papers authored by A. P. Martinich
This map shows the geographic impact of A. P. Martinich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. P. Martinich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. P. Martinich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. P. Martinich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. P. Martinich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. P. Martinich. The network helps show where A. P. Martinich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. P. Martinich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. P. Martinich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. P. Martinich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. P. Martinich. A. P. Martinich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | On Thomas Hobbes’s English Calvinism: Necessity, Omnipotence, and Goodness | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Leviathan, Parts I and Ii - Revised Edition | 4 |
| 8 | Leviathan - Revised Edition | 5 |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 80 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About A. P. Martinich
A. P. Martinich is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 40 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (18 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers) and Political Theology and Sovereignty (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (241 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (43 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (84 citations). A. P. Martinich has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Xiao Yang, David Sosa, S. A. Lloyd and Stephen Darwall. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Philosophical Review and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.