Michael Cooper

2.1k citations
82 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Cooper

78 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 584
  • Reproductive Medicine 604
  • Emergency Medicine 130
  • Surgery 462
  • Urology 41
Replace D. Tscholakoff with:
D. Tscholakoff Austria
Ilse Joubert United Kingdom
Guillaume Legendre France
Stephen R. Payne United Kingdom
Nolan Karstaedt United States
Goldstein United States
Jonathan D. Harper United States
D. M. Wilbert Germany
John A. Dixon United States
Boris Brkljačić Croatia
Michael Cooper relative to D. Tscholakoff Austria D. Tscholakoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
D. Tscholakoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Cooper. The network helps show where Michael Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Michael Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002160
2 2012116
3 2009107
4 199496
5 200980
6 200543
7 201442
8 200737
9 199636
10 202333
11 202131
12 200830
13 201329
14 201226
15 200223
16 201423
17 201821
18 200918
19 201217
20 199917

About Michael Cooper

Michael Cooper is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Instrumentation, Surgery and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 82 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (23 papers), CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (20 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (20 papers), Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (11 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (10 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (7 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (7 papers) and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (584 citations), Reproductive Medicine (604 citations), Emergency Medicine (130 citations), Surgery (462 citations) and Urology (41 citations). Michael Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Philip Kaloo, Geoffrey Reid, Tuan V. Nguyen, David Molloy, Barry E. Burke, R. W. Mountain, P. Daniels, Marc J. N. C. Keirse, Ian S. Fraser and Danny Chou. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum and Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026