Citations per field, relative to Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems
Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems · 1×
×1.83.8kAA
×0.71.0kAMPO
×1.01.1kEEE
×1.3994AE
×1.0661INSTR
Citations per year, relative to Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems
Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.