G Cario
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Rheumatology
- Co-authors
- Mark A. CarltonDanny ChouDavid RosenI. CasikarGavin E. ReidS. ReidChuan LüMichael J. House
- Topics
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments (10 papers)Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers)Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
G Cario
20 papers receiving 396 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 253
- Reproductive Medicine 181
- Surgery 165
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 67
- Rheumatology 54
Countries citing papers authored by G Cario
This map shows the geographic impact of G Cario's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Cario with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Cario more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G Cario
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Cario. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Cario. The network helps show where G Cario may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G Cario
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G Cario. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G Cario based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G Cario. G Cario is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 116 | |
| 8 | Analgesia following major gynecological laparoscopic surgery--PCA versus intermittent intramuscular injection. | 7 |
| 9 | 65 | |
| 10 | 66 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About G Cario
G Cario is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (10 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (253 citations), Reproductive Medicine (181 citations) and Emergency Medicine (50 citations). G Cario has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Carlton, Danny Chou, David Rosen, I. Casikar, Gavin E. Reid, S. Reid, Chuan Lü, Michael J. House, Michael Cooper and Alan Lam. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.