Michael Cook

13 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Michael Cook
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 41
  • Developmental Biology 18
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 144
  • Social Psychology 145
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
Replace Mark Davidson with:
Mark Davidson Canada
Mikaël Molet France
Esteban Freidín Argentina
Jeffrey T. Klein United States
Richard Keir United States
Allison Cleveland United States
Emily D. Klein United States
Jessica I. Lake United States
Débora da Paz Maciel Kimura Canada
Edward C. Simmel United States
Michael Cook relative to Mark Davidson Canada Mark Davidson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mark Davidson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Cook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Cook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Cook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Cook. The network helps show where Michael Cook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Michael Cook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Cook Line = papers co-authored together Michael Cook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1993205
2 199041
3 200018
4 199310
5 198410
6 19899
7 20176
8 19865
9 20223
10 20222
11 19911
12 20041
13 19891
14 20221
15 20050

About Michael Cook

Michael Cook is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (1 paper), Space Exploration and Technology (1 paper), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), Artificial Intelligence in Games (1 paper), Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Animal and Plant Science Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (41 citations), Developmental Biology (18 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (144 citations), Social Psychology (145 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations). Michael Cook has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Susan Mineka, Stephanie Miller, Robert C. Richardson, Raúl Fuentes, Kathleen M Griffiths, Zhibin Li, Adam W. Crawley, Ashley S. Boyd, Caroline T. Clark and Daniel A. Okun. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology General, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Remediation Journal, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and American Water Works Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact