Michael A. Smith

6.6k citations
168 papers · 4.6k indexed · h-index 34

Michael A. Smith

156 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers

Michael A. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.1k
  • Signal Processing 366
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 165
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 544
  • Family Practice 33
Replace Thomas Lehmann with:
Thomas Lehmann Germany
Nicos Maglaveras Greece
Urs E. Ruttimann United States
David Field United Kingdom
Scott Cohen United States
David A. Clifton United Kingdom
Constantinos S. Pattichis Cyprus
Alan Murray United Kingdom
Joshua Richman United States
David Liu United States
Michael A. Smith relative to Thomas Lehmann Germany Thomas Lehmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Thomas Lehmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael A. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael A. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael A. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael A. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael A. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael A. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael A. Smith. The network helps show where Michael A. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael A. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael A. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Michael A. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20225
2 20210
3 20205
4 20202
5 202029
6 20205
7 20198
8 20192
9 20187
10 200887
11 20055
12 20057
13
MEMS tunable planar inductors using DC-contact switches
20044
14 200367
15 200311
16 200287
17
Photoimageable Silver cofireable conductor compatible with 951 Green Tape
19988
18 199539
19 199442
20 19914

About Michael A. Smith

Michael A. Smith is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chemical Health and Safety and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 168 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (14 papers), Terahertz technology and applications (12 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (10 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (10 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.1k citations), Signal Processing (366 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (165 citations). Michael A. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Takeo Kanade, Elizabeth Berry, J. Douglas Crawford, Toshio Sato, Ellen K. Hughes, Anthony J. Fitzgerald, N. N. Zinov’ev, Howard D. Wactlar, Gillian C. Walker and Scott Stevens. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Annals of Pharmacotherapy, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Journal of Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026