Melissa S. Williams
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Law top 5%
- Education
- Co-authors
- Pamela PaxtonMark E. WarrenStephen MacedoTerry NardinJeremy WaldronJoseph H. CarensJennifer RubensteinHenry S. Richardson
- Topics
- Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers)Political Theory and Influence (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Political Science Review
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustria
In The Last Decade
Melissa S. Williams
25 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Political Science and International Relations 250
- Sociology and Political Science 178
- Gender Studies 111
- Law 45
- Education 30
Countries citing papers authored by Melissa S. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa S. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa S. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa S. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa S. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa S. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa S. Williams. The network helps show where Melissa S. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melissa S. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melissa S. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melissa S. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melissa S. Williams. Melissa S. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | Transitional Justice: NOMOS LI | 3 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Intercultural Political Theory, Globalization, and Democratic Agency: A Pragmatic View | 2 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Political exclusion and domination | 16 |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Melissa S. Williams
Melissa S. Williams is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration and Law, having authored 28 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers) and Political Theory and Influence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (111 citations), Political Science and International Relations (250 citations) and Law (45 citations). Melissa S. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Pamela Paxton, Mark E. Warren, Stephen Macedo, Terry Nardin, Jeremy Waldron, Joseph H. Carens, Jennifer Rubenstein, Henry S. Richardson, Rainer Bauböck and Catherine Lu. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and American Political Science Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.