Lyndi Hewitt

513 total citations
8 papers, 276 citations indexed

About

Lyndi Hewitt is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Lyndi Hewitt has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 276 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Gender Studies and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Lyndi Hewitt's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers). Lyndi Hewitt is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers). Lyndi Hewitt collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lyndi Hewitt's co-authors include Holly J. McCammon, Robert D. Benford, David A. Snow, Scott Fitzgerald, S.K. Chaudhuri, Harmony Newman, C. Smith, Cathy Whitlock, Deana A. Rohlinger and Amy Joy Lanou and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Sociology, Sociological Quarterly and Women s Studies International Forum.

In The Last Decade

Lyndi Hewitt

8 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lyndi Hewitt United States	6	157	74	46	33	31	8	276
Sean Chabot United States	7	220 1.4×	108 1.5×	30 0.7×	37 1.1×	22 0.7×	15	314
Matthew R. Miles United States	10	164 1.0×	131 1.8×	46 1.0×	88 2.7×	24 0.8×	26	295
Joy Leopold United States	5	120 0.8×	28 0.4×	67 1.5×	39 1.2×	22 0.7×	5	250
P.E. Digeser United States	7	156 1.0×	100 1.4×	32 0.7×	15 0.5×	20 0.6×	15	260
Matthew T. Witt United States	7	132 0.8×	100 1.4×	20 0.4×	19 0.6×	10 0.3×	26	281
Andrea D. Bührmann Germany	8	151 1.0×	54 0.7×	27 0.6×	13 0.4×	8 0.3×	43	265
Sean Phelan New Zealand	10	159 1.0×	97 1.3×	44 1.0×	126 3.8×	8 0.3×	35	347
Roger Deacon South Africa	11	154 1.0×	81 1.1×	25 0.5×	12 0.4×	8 0.3×	29	296
Priska Daphi Germany	10	200 1.3×	99 1.3×	21 0.5×	37 1.1×	15 0.5×	33	308
Jane Franklin United Kingdom	8	169 1.1×	55 0.7×	16 0.3×	14 0.4×	16 0.5×	11	292

Countries citing papers authored by Lyndi Hewitt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lyndi Hewitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lyndi Hewitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lyndi Hewitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lyndi Hewitt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lyndi Hewitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lyndi Hewitt. The network helps show where Lyndi Hewitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lyndi Hewitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lyndi Hewitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lyndi Hewitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lyndi Hewitt. Lyndi Hewitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Whitlock, Cathy, et al.. (2022). The Social Bridging Project: Intergenerational Phone-Based Connections With Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine. 8. 2612126545–2612126545. 7 indexed citations

2.

Rohlinger, Deana A., et al.. (2020). Dualing discourse: Democracy, gender equity and discursive politics in rural Morocco. Women s Studies International Forum. 81. 102373–102373. 4 indexed citations

3.

Hewitt, Lyndi, et al.. (2017). Development and Assessment of a Course to Reduce Weight Bias in Undergraduate Health Promotion Students. Pedagogy in Health Promotion. 4(3). 200–210. 6 indexed citations

4.

Snow, David A., Robert D. Benford, Holly J. McCammon, Lyndi Hewitt, & Scott Fitzgerald. (2014). The Emergence, Development, and Future of the Framing Perspective: 25+ Years Since "Frame Alignment". Mobilization An International Quarterly. 19(1). 23–46. 156 indexed citations

5.

Hewitt, Lyndi. (2008). Feminists and the Forum: Is It Worth the Effort?. 3(1). 118–135. 4 indexed citations

6.

McCammon, Holly J., et al.. (2008). Becoming Full Citizens: The U.S. Women’s Jury Rights Campaigns, the Pace of Reform, and Strategic Adaptation. American Journal of Sociology. 113(4). 1104–1147. 45 indexed citations

7.

Hewitt, Lyndi & Holly J. McCammon. (2004). Explaining Suffrage Mobilization: Balance, Neutralization, and Range in Collective Action Frames, 1892–1919. Mobilization An International Quarterly. 9(2). 149–166. 28 indexed citations

8.

McCammon, Holly J., et al.. (2004). “No Weapon Save Argument”: Strategic Frame Amplification in the U.S. Woman Suffrage Movements. Sociological Quarterly. 45(3). 529–556. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact