Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Macedo
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Macedo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Macedo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Macedo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Macedo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Macedo. The network helps show where Stephen Macedo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Macedo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Macedo.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Macedo based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Macedo. Stephen Macedo is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mansbridge, Jane & Stephen Macedo. (2019). Populism and Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 15(1). 59–77.61 indexed citations
4.
Macedo, Stephen. (2015). Just Married. Princeton University Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
5.
Bell, Daniel A., Joseph Chan, Tongdong Bai, et al.. (2013). The East Asian Challenge for Democracy. Cambridge University Press eBooks.24 indexed citations
6.
Macedo, Stephen. (2012). Hauerwas, Liberalism, and Public Reason: Terms of Engagement?. Law and Contemporary Problems. 75(4). 161–180.4 indexed citations
7.
Macedo, Stephen. (2011). Political Education and Public Reason. SSRN Electronic Journal.
8.
Waal, Frans Β. Μ. de, Christine M. Korsgaard, Philip Kitcher, et al.. (2011). Primaten und Philosophen : wie die Evolution die Moral hervorbrachte. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag eBooks.2 indexed citations
9.
Creppell, Ingrid, Russell Hardin, & Stephen Macedo. (2008). toleration on trial. Lexington Books.1 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Melissa S. & Stephen Macedo. (2005). Political exclusion and domination. New York University Press eBooks.16 indexed citations
11.
Macedo, Stephen & Chester E. Finn. (2004). Civic Education: Can Public Schools Teach Good Citizenship?. Education next. 4(2). 9.
Macedo, Stephen & Iris Marion Young. (2003). Child, family, and state. New York University Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
14.
Macedo, Stephen & Yael Tamir. (2002). Moral and Political Education: NOMOS XLIII. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).5 indexed citations
15.
Macedo, Stephen. (2001). The Constitution, Civic Virtue, and Civil Society: Social Capital as Substantive Morality. Fordham law review. 69(5). 1573.6 indexed citations
16.
Macedo, Stephen. (2000). Constituting Civil Society: School Vouchers, Religious Nonprofit Organizations, and Liberal Public Values. Chicago-Kent law review. 75(2). 417.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.