Melissa Minter
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Insect Science top 10%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Papers in
- Genetics 4
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 2
-
- Plant and animal studies 2
- Co-authors
- Christopher M. Jones (2 shared papers)Ka S. Lim (2 shared papers)Jason W. Chapman (1 shared paper)Kenneth Wilson (1 shared paper)David O’Brien (2 shared papers)Jane K. Hill (3 shared papers)Gernot Segelbacher (2 shared papers)José A. Godoy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ecological Entomology (2 papers)Molecular Ecology (1 paper)Ecosystems and People (1 paper)Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)People and Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Melissa Minter
9 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Ecological Modeling 38
- Insect Science 68
- Genetics 114
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 68
- Ecology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Melissa Minter
This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa Minter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa Minter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa Minter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa Minter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa Minter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa Minter. The network helps show where Melissa Minter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melissa Minter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 83 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 0 |
About Melissa Minter
Melissa Minter is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 11 papers that have together received 250 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (2 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (1 paper), Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (1 paper) and Insect Utilization and Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (38 citations), Insect Science (68 citations), Genetics (114 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (68 citations) and Ecology (62 citations). Melissa Minter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christopher M. Jones, Ka S. Lim, Jason W. Chapman, Kenneth Wilson, David O’Brien, Jane K. Hill, Gernot Segelbacher, José A. Godoy, Francine Kershaw and Brittany A. Garner. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Entomology, Molecular Ecology, Ecosystems and People, Ecology and Evolution and People and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.