Herbert Venthur

802 citations
31 papers · 624 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Herbert Venthur

30 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers

Herbert Venthur
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Insect Science 330
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 374
  • Genetics 183
  • Sensory Systems 24
  • Plant Science 127
Replace Young-Moo Choo with:
Young-Moo Choo United States
Zhaojun Xin China
Marion J. Healy Australia
Zhichun Xu China
Sukanya Ramasamy Sweden
Amali Thrimawithana New Zealand
Julie A. Tillman United States
Maryse Nicolaı̈ France
J. Avilla Spain
Diogo Montes Vidal Brazil
Herbert Venthur relative to Young-Moo Choo United States Young-Moo Choo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Young-Moo Choo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Venthur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Venthur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Venthur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Venthur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Venthur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Venthur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Venthur. The network helps show where Herbert Venthur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Herbert Venthur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Herbert Venthur Line = papers co-authored together Herbert Venthur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018178
2 201665
3 201455
4 201646
5 202033
6 201832
7
Egg production, somatic growth and productivity of copepods in the Benguela Current system and Angola-Benguela Front
200127
8 201826
9 202125
10 201619
11 202117
12 202217
13 201616
14 201913
15 202210
16 20207
17 20196
18 20186
19 20225
20 20145

About Herbert Venthur

Herbert Venthur is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Plant Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (23 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (10 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (9 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (5 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (5 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (5 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (4 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (330 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (374 citations), Genetics (183 citations), Sensory Systems (24 citations) and Plant Science (127 citations). Herbert Venthur has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Jing‐Jiang Zhou, Ana Mutis, Andrés Quiróz, Paola Fincheira, Rafael A. Homem, Ricardo Ceballos, Filomena De Biasio, Gerarda Grossi, A.R. Cole and Patrizia Falabella. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Physiology, Insects, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D Genomics and Proteomics and Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact