Meinhard Wlaschek
- Dermatology top 0.05%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Immunology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Karin Scharffetter‐KochanekPeter BrenneisenJutta WenkKarlis BrivibaThomas KriegAnca SindrilaruHelmut SiesThorsten Peters
- Topics
- Skin Protection and Aging (44 papers)Wound Healing and Treatments (18 papers)Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Meinhard Wlaschek
96 papers receiving 7.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Dermatology 3.0k
- Molecular Biology 2.4k
- Rehabilitation 1.1k
- Cell Biology 1.1k
- Immunology 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Meinhard Wlaschek
This map shows the geographic impact of Meinhard Wlaschek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meinhard Wlaschek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meinhard Wlaschek more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Meinhard Wlaschek
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meinhard Wlaschek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meinhard Wlaschek. The network helps show where Meinhard Wlaschek may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Meinhard Wlaschek
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Meinhard Wlaschek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Meinhard Wlaschek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Meinhard Wlaschek. Meinhard Wlaschek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Endocrine Controls of Skin Agingbreakdown → | 16 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Connective Tissue and Fibroblast Senescence in Skin Agingbreakdown → | 171 |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 196 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 78 | |
| 12 | 98 | |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | Das chronisch venöse Ulcus cruris: Pathogenese und Bedeutung des „aggressiven Mikromilieus” | 4 |
| 15 | 37 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | 96 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 89 | |
| 20 | 118 |
About Meinhard Wlaschek
Meinhard Wlaschek is a scholar working on Dermatology, Rehabilitation and Aging, having authored 96 papers that have together received 7.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Skin Protection and Aging (44 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (18 papers) and Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (3.0k citations), Rehabilitation (1.1k citations) and Biochemistry (795 citations). Meinhard Wlaschek has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Karin Scharffetter‐Kochanek, Peter Brenneisen, Jutta Wenk, Karlis Briviba, Thomas Krieg, Anca Sindrilaru, Helmut Sies, Thorsten Peters, Gernot Herrmann and Adelheid Hainzl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.