Experimental Gerontology

6.5k papers and 202.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.5k papers published in Experimental Gerontology in the last decades have received a total of 202.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Experimental Gerontology usually cover Physiology (2.4k papers), Molecular Biology (1.8k papers) and Aging (1000 papers) specifically the topics of Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (1000 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (571 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (495 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Experimental Gerontology are Martin D. Brand, Graham Pawelec, Edward J. Masoro, Leonard Hayflick, Rajindar S. Sohal, Thomas von Zglinicki, Mark P. Mattson, Rita B. Effros, Robert M. Sapolsky and Jaime Miquel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Experimental Gerontology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Experimental Gerontology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Experimental Gerontology.

Countries where authors publish in Experimental Gerontology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Experimental Gerontology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Experimental Gerontology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Experimental Gerontology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025