Mehmet Toner

65.2k citations
457 papers · 41.1k indexed · 15 hit papers · h-index 99

Mehmet Toner

446 papers receiving 40.1k citations

Hit Papers

Clusters of circulating tum...366199620262006201650010001.5k2.0k2.5k

Peers

Mehmet Toner
Comparison fields: 5 of 200
  • Biomedical Engineering 21.3k
  • Cancer Research 5.7k
  • Oncology 9.1k
  • Hepatology 2.5k
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.5k
Replace Robert J. Gillies with:
Robert J. Gillies United States
Peter L. Choyke United States
Dai Fukumura United States
Mark W. Dewhirst United States
Mina J. Bissell United States
Harold F. Dvorak United States
Sanjiv S. Gambhir United States
Ralph R. Weichselbaum United States
Kenneth M. Yamada United States
Raghu Kalluri United States
Mehmet Toner relative to Robert J. Gillies United States Robert J. Gillies's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Robert J. Gillies · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mehmet Toner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mehmet Toner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mehmet Toner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mehmet Toner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mehmet Toner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mehmet Toner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mehmet Toner. The network helps show where Mehmet Toner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mehmet Toner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mehmet Toner Line = papers co-authored together Mehmet Toner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202411
2 20241
3 20231
4 20215
5 202017
6 202017
7 201878
8 201834
9 2017115
10 201535
11 201451
12 2014200
13
Circulating Tumor Cell Clusters Are Oligoclonal Precursors of Breast Cancer Metastasisbreakdown →
20141786
14
Circulating Breast Tumor Cells Exhibit Dynamic Changes in Epithelial and Mesenchymal Compositionbreakdown →
20131928
15 2012217
16 200625
17 20046
18 20042
19 200253
20 1990290

About Mehmet Toner

Mehmet Toner is a scholar working on Hepatology, Biomedical Engineering and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 457 papers that have together received 41.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (104 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (92 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (66 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (59 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (58 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (52 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (41 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (33 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomedical Engineering (21.3k citations), Cancer Research (5.7k citations) and Oncology (9.1k citations). Mehmet Toner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Irimia, Martin L. Yarmush, Ronald G. Tompkins, Daniel A. Haber, Shyamala Maheswaran, Dino Di Carlo, Shannon L. Stott, Ulysses J. Balis, Lecia V. Sequist and Joseph M. Martel. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and New England Journal of Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026