Edward Craig

2.0k citations
27 papers · 713 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Edward Craig

26 papers receiving 564 citations

Peers

Edward Craig
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Philosophy 484
  • History and Philosophy of Science 113
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 243
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 118
  • Family Practice 10
Replace Thomas Reid with:
Thomas Reid United States
Jonathan E. Adler United States
Barry Stroud United States
Richard Fumerton United States
Louise Antony United States
Thomas Kelly United States
Dennis Whitcomb United States
Marie McGinn United Kingdom
Jonathan L. Kvanvig United States
Leslie Stevenson United Kingdom
Edward Craig relative to Thomas Reid United States Thomas Reid's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Thomas Reid · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward Craig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Craig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Craig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Craig. The network helps show where Edward Craig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Edward Craig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward Craig Line = papers co-authored together Edward Craig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992187
2 1999185
3 200568
4 198555
5 199646
6 199234
7 199129
8 196916
9 197616
10 198712
11 198210
12 20028
13 20137
14 19677
15
David Hume: eine Einführung in seine Philosophie
19795
16 19694
17 19833
18 19693
19 19683
20 20003

About Edward Craig

Edward Craig is a scholar working on Philosophy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (1 paper), History of Science and Medicine (1 paper), Legal and Social Philosophy (1 paper) and Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (484 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (113 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (243 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (118 citations) and Family Practice (10 citations). Edward Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Steup, P. M. S. Hacker, G. P. Baker, Jonathan Dancy, Roger Scruton, I. G. McFetridge, J. S. Haldane, Richard Feldman, Peter Carruthers and Anurag A. Agrawal. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, The Philosophical Review and Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact