Matthew Dixon
Impact in
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
- Internal Medicine top 10%
Papers in
-
- Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment 8
- Oncology 26
- Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 19
- Co-authors
- Wee‐Shian ChanNatalie G. CoburnLucy HelyerCalvin LawRoberta CardosoRajini SeevaratnamAlina BocicariuNiraj J. Gusani
- Journals
- Annals of Surgical Oncology (7 papers)Gastric Cancer (6 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (6 papers)HPB (6 papers)Journal of Surgical Oncology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Matthew Dixon
45 papers receiving 548 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Gastroenterology 90
- Internal Medicine 34
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 259
- Oncology 189
- Surgery 223
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Dixon. The network helps show where Matthew Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Dixon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 17 | What is the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy for gastric cancer? A systematic review (Systematic Reviews : Current issues in gastric cancer) | 2012 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 75 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 20 |
About Matthew Dixon
Matthew Dixon is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Oncology, Hepatology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 56 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (19 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (16 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (10 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (9 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (8 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (7 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (6 papers) and Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (90 citations), Internal Medicine (34 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (259 citations), Oncology (189 citations) and Surgery (223 citations). Matthew Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Wee‐Shian Chan, Natalie G. Coburn, Lucy Helyer, Calvin Law, Roberta Cardoso, Rajini Seevaratnam, Alina Bocicariu, Niraj J. Gusani, Alyson Mahar and Lavanya Yohanathan. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Surgical Oncology, Gastric Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, HPB and Journal of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.