Jill Tinmouth
- Oncology top 2%
- Surgery top 5%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Linda RabeneckLawrence PaszatNancy N. BaxterLeah S. SteeleRinku SutradharIris Lansdorp‐VogelaarIrving E. SalitJames E. Allison
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (99 papers)Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (51 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (27 papers)
- Cited by
- OncologyEpidemiologyGastroenterology
- Journals
- JAMAJournal of Clinical OncologySHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jill Tinmouth
152 papers receiving 3.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Oncology 1.6k
- Surgery 1.1k
- Epidemiology 981
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 838
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 416
Countries citing papers authored by Jill Tinmouth
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Tinmouth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Tinmouth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Tinmouth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Tinmouth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Tinmouth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Tinmouth. The network helps show where Jill Tinmouth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Tinmouth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Tinmouth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Tinmouth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Tinmouth. Jill Tinmouth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 59 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project | 1 |
| 16 | ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project: family physician perceptions. | 9 |
| 17 | A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake. | 17 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 135 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Jill Tinmouth
Jill Tinmouth is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 162 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (99 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (51 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (27 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.6k citations), Epidemiology (981 citations) and Gastroenterology (147 citations). Jill Tinmouth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Linda Rabeneck, Lawrence Paszat, Nancy N. Baxter, Leah S. Steele, Rinku Sutradhar, Iris Lansdorp‐Vogelaar, Irving E. Salit, James E. Allison, Janet Raboud and Marie Sano. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.