Annals of Surgical Oncology

13.6k papers and 401.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.6k papers published in Annals of Surgical Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 401.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Surgical Oncology usually cover Surgery (6.6k papers), Oncology (6.2k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (4.1k papers) specifically the topics of Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2.2k papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (1.8k papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Surgical Oncology are Carolyn C. Compton, Stephen B. Edge, Murray F. Brennan, Daniel G. Coit, Andrew K. Stewart, Timothy M. Pawlik, Monica Morrow, Merrick I. Ross, Jean‐Nicolas Vauthey and David P. Winchester.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Surgical Oncology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Surgical Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Surgical Oncology.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Surgical Oncology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Surgical Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Surgical Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Surgical Oncology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025