Natalie G. Coburn

10.0k total citations · 3 hit papers
306 papers, 5.9k citations indexed

About

Natalie G. Coburn is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie G. Coburn has authored 306 papers receiving a total of 5.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 159 papers in Oncology, 111 papers in Surgery and 108 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Natalie G. Coburn's work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (73 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (64 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (36 papers). Natalie G. Coburn is often cited by papers focused on Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (73 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (64 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (36 papers). Natalie G. Coburn collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Natalie G. Coburn's co-authors include Calvin Law, Alyson Mahar, Julie Hallet, Alex Kiss, Rajini Seevaratnam, Lucy Helyer, Roberta Cardoso, Paul J. Karanicolas, Allan S. Detsky and Christopher J.D. Wallis and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Natalie G. Coburn

285 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study

2017 371 citations Christopher J.D. Wallis, Natalie G. Coburn et al. BMJ profile →
Association of Surgeon-Patient Sex Concordance With Postoperative Outcomes

2021 211 citations Christopher J.D. Wallis, Angela Jerath et al. profile →
Surgeon Sex and Long-Term Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Common Surgeries

2023 95 citations Christopher J.D. Wallis, Angela Jerath et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Natalie G. Coburn Canada	40	2.4k	2.3k	2.3k	816	774	306	5.9k
Rinku Sutradhar Canada	42	1.8k 0.7×	1.2k 0.5×	3.2k 1.4×	2.0k 2.5×	213 0.3×	347	6.9k
Taylor S. Riall United States	47	3.3k 1.3×	4.8k 2.0×	5.9k 2.5×	509 0.6×	324 0.4×	159	8.2k
Samuel R.G. Finlayson United States	36	1.2k 0.5×	2.7k 1.1×	1.4k 0.6×	682 0.8×	181 0.2×	114	5.1k
Aslam Ejaz United States	44	2.2k 0.9×	3.0k 1.3×	3.1k 1.3×	537 0.7×	223 0.3×	302	6.1k
Jordan M. Cloyd United States	42	1.8k 0.7×	2.9k 1.2×	3.4k 1.5×	485 0.6×	162 0.2×	335	6.7k
Mary T. Hawn United States	48	1.3k 0.5×	4.4k 1.9×	1.4k 0.6×	535 0.7×	345 0.4×	229	7.2k
Elijah Dixon Canada	45	1.8k 0.7×	3.8k 1.6×	2.6k 1.1×	455 0.6×	101 0.1×	215	7.4k
Ryan P. Merkow United States	32	1.4k 0.6×	3.1k 1.3×	1.8k 0.8×	339 0.4×	187 0.2×	153	5.6k
Melinda A. Maggard United States	39	1.4k 0.6×	4.0k 1.7×	3.2k 1.4×	464 0.6×	188 0.2×	82	8.0k
William E. Strodel United States	40	812 0.3×	2.5k 1.1×	760 0.3×	598 0.7×	179 0.2×	134	4.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie G. Coburn

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie G. Coburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie G. Coburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie G. Coburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie G. Coburn

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie G. Coburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie G. Coburn. The network helps show where Natalie G. Coburn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie G. Coburn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie G. Coburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie G. Coburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie G. Coburn. Natalie G. Coburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Giblon, Rachel, Alyson Mahar, Julie Hallet, et al.. (2025). Intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) and cancer symptom reporting: a matched retrospective cohort study. Supportive Care in Cancer. 33(7). 571–571.

Hallet, Julie, Angela Jerath, Antoine Eskander, et al.. (2023). The association between hospital high-volume anesthesiology care and patient outcomes for complex gastrointestinal cancer surgery: A population-based study. HPB. 25. S62–S62. 2 indexed citations

Saadat, Lily V., Elizabeth Schofield, Michael Curry, et al.. (2023). Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Ontario and the USA. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 31(1). 58–65. 4 indexed citations

Bateni, Sarah B., Natalie G. Coburn, Calvin Law, et al.. (2023). Second primary cancers and survival among neuroendocrine tumor patients. Endocrine Related Cancer. 30(8). 3 indexed citations

Wallis, Christopher J.D., Angela Jerath, Raj Satkunasivam, et al.. (2023). Association between patient-surgeon gender concordance and mortality after surgery in the United States: retrospective observational study. BMJ. 383. e075484–e075484. 13 indexed citations

Chen, Jianan, Helen Cheung, Paul J. Karanicolas, et al.. (2023). A radiomic biomarker for prognosis of resected colorectal cancer liver metastases generalizes across MRI contrast agents. Frontiers in Oncology. 13. 898854–898854. 4 indexed citations

Khan, Rishad, Peter Tanuseputro, Amy T. Hsu, et al.. (2022). Initial treatment is associated with improved survival and end-of-life outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer: a cohort study. BMC Cancer. 22(1). 1312–1312.

Fu, Rui, Rinku Sutradhar, Qing Li, et al.. (2022). Imaging and physician visits at cancer diagnosis: COVID ‐19 pandemic impact on cancer care. Cancer Medicine. 12(5). 6056–6067. 4 indexed citations

Bubis, Lev D., Laura Davis, Kelvin Chan, et al.. (2020). Patient-reported symptoms in metastatic gastric cancer patients in the last 6 months of life. Supportive Care in Cancer. 29(1). 515–524. 15 indexed citations

10.

Mahar, Alyson, Paul Kurdyak, Timothy P. Hanna, Natalie G. Coburn, & Patti A. Groome. (2020). The effect of a severe psychiatric illness on colorectal cancer treatment and survival: A population-based retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0235409–e0235409. 25 indexed citations

11.

Mahar, Alyson, Laura Davis, Paul Kurdyak, et al.. (2020). Using additive and relative hazards to quantify colorectal survival inequalities for patients with a severe psychiatric illness. Annals of Epidemiology. 56. 70–74. 3 indexed citations

12.

Hird, Amanda, et al.. (2020). Does prophylactic ureteric stenting at the time of colorectal surgery reduce the risk of ureteric injury? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Colorectal Disease. 23(5). 1060–1070. 19 indexed citations

13.

Hallet, Julie, Natalie G. Coburn, Longdi Fu, et al.. (2018). Reducing repeat imaging in hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgical cancer care through shared diagnostic imaging repositories. HPB. 21(1). 96–106. 4 indexed citations

14.

Mahar, Alyson, Daniel J. Kagedan, Julie Hallet, & Natalie G. Coburn. (2017). Secondary gastric cancer malignancies following a breast cancer diagnosis: A population-based analysis. The Breast. 33. 34–37. 4 indexed citations

15.

Hallet, Julie, David Wallace, Abraham El‐Sedfy, et al.. (2015). Optimizing Inter-Professional Communications in Surgery: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). e8–e8. 4 indexed citations

16.

Karanicolas, Paul J., Sean P. Cleary, Paul McHardy, et al.. (2014). Medial open transversus abdominis plane (MOTAP) catheters for analgesia following open liver resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 15(1). 241–241. 8 indexed citations

17.

Earle, Craig C., Roxanne Cosby, Natalie G. Coburn, et al.. (2012). Neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for resectable gastric cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline for North America. Gastric Cancer. 16(1). 28–40. 38 indexed citations

18.

Seevaratnam, Rajini, Natalie G. Coburn, & Roberta Cardoso. (2012). A systematic review of the indications for genetic testing and prophylactic gastrectomy among patients with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (Systematic Reviews : Current issues in gastric cancer). Gastric Cancer. 15(1). 4 indexed citations

19.

Cardoso, Roberta, Natalie G. Coburn, & Rajini Seevaratnam. (2012). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of EUS for preoperative staging for gastric cancer (Systematic Reviews : Current issues in gastric cancer). Gastric Cancer. 15(1). 5 indexed citations

20.

Coburn, Natalie G., Raymond Przybysz, Lisa Barbera, et al.. (2011). Evaluation of CT and MRI scanning among cancer patientsin Ontario. Clinical Imaging. 35(4). 301–308. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact