Journal of Surgical Oncology

10.2k papers and 202.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 10.2k papers published in Journal of Surgical Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 202.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Surgical Oncology usually cover Surgery (4.6k papers), Oncology (4.4k papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (3.5k papers) specifically the topics of Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1.0k papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (979 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (874 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Surgical Oncology are Yeu‐Tsu N. Lee, Paul H. Sugarbaker, Nicole C. Hodgson, Ashok R. Shaha, Warren H. Cole, William R. Waddell, Marcello Deraco, Shigeki Kusamura, Dario Baratti and Robert C.G. Martin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Surgical Oncology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Surgical Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Surgical Oncology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Surgical Oncology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Surgical Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Surgical Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Surgical Oncology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025