Mary Wells

6.2k citations
136 papers · 3.7k indexed · h-index 36

Impact in

Papers in

Mary Wells

125 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Mary Wells
Comparison fields: 5 of 169
  • Otorhinolaryngology 345
  • General Health Professions 1.0k
  • Oncology 1.1k
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 218
  • Family Practice 74
Replace Noreen C. Facione with:
Noreen C. Facione United States
Doris Howell Canada
Suzanne L. Dibble United States
Jessica Corner United Kingdom
Kate White Australia
Alison Richardson United Kingdom
Emma Ream United Kingdom
Sanchia Aranda Australia
Susan M. Rawl United States
Davina Porock United Kingdom
Mary Wells relative to Noreen C. Facione United States Noreen C. Facione's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Noreen C. Facione · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Wells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Wells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Wells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Wells. The network helps show where Mary Wells may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Wells, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Wells Line = papers co-authored together Mary Wells links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20241
4 20242
5 20243
6 20231
7 20235
8 20231
9 202214
10 20227
11 202135
12 202117
13 202023
14 202051
15 202010
16 20195
17 201883
18 201463
19
A UK consensus on the management of the bladder in multiple sclerosis (Reprinted from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, vol 80, pg 470-7, 2009)
20098
20
Supportive care in radiotherapy
200348

About Mary Wells

Mary Wells is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Otorhinolaryngology, Family Practice, Oncology and General Health Professions, having authored 136 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (39 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (17 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (11 papers), Family Support in Illness (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (9 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (9 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (345 citations), General Health Professions (1.0k citations), Oncology (1.1k citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (218 citations) and Family Practice (74 citations). Mary Wells has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Brian Williams, Heidi Lang, Stephen MacGillivray, M. Cunningham, Joanne Coyle, Gerry Humphris, Emma F. France, Alastair M. Thompson, Shaun Treweek and Alison Harrow. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, European Journal of Oncology Nursing, Trials, Supportive Care in Cancer and Psycho-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026