Emma King

11.3k total citations
24 papers, 206 citations indexed

About

Emma King is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma King has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 206 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Physiology and 5 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Emma King's work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (4 papers). Emma King is often cited by papers focused on Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (4 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (4 papers). Emma King collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Denmark. Emma King's co-authors include Mary Wells, Catherine Lyall, Neil Stephens, Duncan B. McLaren, Ian Kunkler, Gill Haddow, Mark Achtman, Gordon Dougan, Philippe Roumagnac and Esther van de Vosse and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Emma King

22 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma King United Kingdom 7 62 45 40 34 30 24 206
Kuicheng Zheng China 8 36 0.6× 12 0.3× 29 0.7× 3 0.1× 10 0.3× 23 211
Jeffrey McCollum United States 7 39 0.6× 6 0.1× 3 0.1× 25 0.7× 26 0.9× 13 191
Mohammad Reza Mohammadi Iran 9 9 0.1× 6 0.1× 18 0.5× 48 1.4× 8 0.3× 60 270
Amy Lee United States 8 16 0.3× 19 0.4× 2 0.1× 51 1.5× 22 0.7× 15 317
Carlos A. Rodríguez-Osorio Mexico 7 11 0.2× 35 0.8× 3 0.1× 61 1.8× 68 2.3× 9 351
Marwh G. Aldriwesh Saudi Arabia 8 15 0.2× 5 0.1× 3 0.1× 46 1.4× 28 0.9× 21 236
Tarik Walker United States 5 9 0.1× 3 0.1× 10 0.3× 13 0.4× 8 0.3× 6 161
Elena Banci Italy 5 18 0.3× 9 0.2× 5 0.1× 32 0.9× 3 0.1× 5 291
Alexander Hose Germany 7 22 0.4× 5 0.1× 27 0.7× 53 1.6× 14 361
Alexis Burakoff United States 8 31 0.5× 5 0.1× 4 0.1× 12 0.4× 4 0.1× 17 236

Countries citing papers authored by Emma King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma King. The network helps show where Emma King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma King. Emma King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dick, Finlay, Richard G. Kyle, Philip Wilson, et al.. (2025). Contact with the National Health Service in the week after an acute medical paediatric admission. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 110(9). 712–716. 1 indexed citations
2.
Malcolm, Cari, Pat Hoddinott, Emma King, et al.. (2024). Short-stay urgent hospital admissions of children with convulsions: A mixed methods exploratory study to inform out of hospital care pathways. PLoS ONE. 19(4). e0301071–e0301071. 1 indexed citations
3.
King, Emma, et al.. (2024). Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience: (RReHOPE) findings from a realist review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 13(42). 1–50.
4.
Woerden, Hugo van, Emma King, Charlotte Wendelboe‐Nelson, et al.. (2024). Improving the mental health of farmers: what types of remote support are acceptable, feasible, and improve outcomes? A feasibility RCT. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). 4–4. 1 indexed citations
5.
King, Emma, et al.. (2023). Health visiting in the UK in light of the COVID-19 pandemic experience (RReHOPE): a realist review protocol. BMJ Open. 13(3). e068544–e068544. 2 indexed citations
7.
King, Emma, Emma F. France, Cari Malcolm, et al.. (2023). Identifying and prioritising future interventions with stakeholders to improve paediatric urgent care pathways in Scotland, UK: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 13(10). e074141–e074141. 3 indexed citations
8.
Malcolm, Cari, Emma King, Emma F. France, et al.. (2022). Short stay hospital admissions for an acutely unwell child: A qualitative study of outcomes that matter to parents and professionals. PLoS ONE. 17(12). e0278777–e0278777. 5 indexed citations
9.
King, Emma, Helen Cheyne, Purva Abhyankar, et al.. (2022). Promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy: A feasibility and pilot trial of a digital storytelling intervention delivered via text‐messaging. Patient Education and Counseling. 105(7). 2562–2572. 6 indexed citations
10.
Dick, Finlay, Richard G. Kyle, Philip Wilson, et al.. (2022). Insights from and limitations of data linkage studies: analysis of short-stay urgent admission referral source from routinely collected Scottish data. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 108(4). 300–306. 5 indexed citations
11.
Patterson, Joanne, et al.. (2019). Feasibility and outcomes of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing following prophylactic swallowing rehabilitation in head and neck cancer. Clinical Otolaryngology. 44(4). 549–556. 5 indexed citations
12.
13.
Stephens, Neil, Emma King, & Catherine Lyall. (2018). Blood, meat, and upscaling tissue engineering: Promises, anticipated markets, and performativity in the biomedical and agri-food sectors. BioSocieties. 13(2). 368–388. 28 indexed citations
14.
King, Emma & Catherine Lyall. (2018). What's in a name: are cultured red blood cells ‘natural’?. Sociology of Health & Illness. 40(4). 687–701. 4 indexed citations
15.
Wells, Mary & Emma King. (2017). Patient adherence to swallowing exercises in head and neck cancer. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery. 25(3). 175–181. 25 indexed citations
16.
Lyall, Catherine & Emma King. (2016). Using qualitative research methods in biomedical innovation: the case of cultured red blood cells for transfusion. BMC Research Notes. 9(1). 267–267. 2 indexed citations
17.
Wells, Mary, Emma King, Fiona Macaulay, et al.. (2016). Development and feasibility of a Swallowing intervention Package (SiP) for patients receiving radiotherapy treatment for head and neck cancer—the SiP study protocol. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2(1). 40–40. 12 indexed citations
18.
Haddow, Gill, Emma King, Ian Kunkler, & Duncan B. McLaren. (2015). Cyborgs in the Everyday: Masculinity and Biosensing Prostate Cancer. Science as Culture. 24(4). 484–506. 20 indexed citations
19.
Baker, Stephen, Kathryn E. Holt, Esther van de Vosse, et al.. (2008). High-Throughput Genotyping of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi Allowing Geographical Assignment of Haplotypes and Pathotypes within an Urban District of Jakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 46(5). 1741–1746. 57 indexed citations
20.
King, Emma. (2004). A Wee Lesson in Science Communication. PLoS Biology. 2(4). e122–e122. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026