Alison Harrow

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
11 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Alison Harrow is a scholar working on Oncology, Sociology and Political Science and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Alison Harrow has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Oncology, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Alison Harrow's work include Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers). Alison Harrow is often cited by papers focused on Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers) and BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers). Alison Harrow collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Alison Harrow's co-authors include Nora Kearney, Grigorios Kotronoulas, Roma Maguire, Stephen MacGillivray, Brenda Happell, Mary Wells, Brian Williams, Gerry Humphris, Alastair M. Thompson and Colin McCowan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Alison Harrow

11 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

What Is the Value of the Routine Use of Patient-Reported ... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Alison Harrow United Kingdom 8 507 284 224 184 127 11 1.1k
Claudette G. Varricchio United States 13 307 0.6× 231 0.8× 212 0.9× 143 0.8× 122 1.0× 28 1.0k
Elizabeth A. Rohan United States 18 651 1.3× 283 1.0× 312 1.4× 167 0.9× 172 1.4× 48 1.1k
Claudia Rutherford Australia 21 443 0.9× 213 0.8× 216 1.0× 125 0.7× 96 0.8× 88 1.2k
Sharon A. Dobie United States 16 481 0.9× 273 1.0× 222 1.0× 125 0.7× 102 0.8× 32 1.1k
Eva Greimel Austria 14 587 1.2× 274 1.0× 194 0.9× 187 1.0× 215 1.7× 20 1.1k
Kate Clay United States 6 327 0.6× 258 0.9× 494 2.2× 156 0.8× 97 0.8× 10 925
James Holland United States 6 640 1.3× 249 0.9× 206 0.9× 194 1.1× 297 2.3× 6 1.3k
Stephen Kearing United States 12 437 0.9× 324 1.1× 638 2.8× 204 1.1× 141 1.1× 28 1.2k
Timothy Pearman United States 14 512 1.0× 314 1.1× 109 0.5× 288 1.6× 91 0.7× 22 939
Ashley Leak Bryant United States 19 468 0.9× 249 0.9× 127 0.6× 256 1.4× 133 1.0× 96 986

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Harrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Harrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Harrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Harrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Harrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Harrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Harrow. The network helps show where Alison Harrow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison Harrow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison Harrow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison Harrow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alison Harrow. Alison Harrow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Treweek, Shaun, et al.. (2015). Do participants in adjuvant breast cancer trials reflect the breast cancer patient population?. European Journal of Cancer. 51(8). 907–914. 14 indexed citations
2.
Harrow, Alison, et al.. (2014). A hard pill to swallow: a qualitative study of women's experiences of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. BMJ Open. 4(6). e005285–e005285. 63 indexed citations
3.
Harrow, Alison, et al.. (2014). E05. Living with and beyond breast cancer: European perspectives. European Journal of Cancer. 50. S10–S11. 1 indexed citations
4.
Kotronoulas, Grigorios, et al.. (2014). What Is the Value of the Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Toward Improvement of Patient Outcomes, Processes of Care, and Health Service Outcomes in Cancer Care? A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 32(14). 1480–1501. 680 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Happell, Brenda & Alison Harrow. (2010). Nurses' attitudes to the use of seclusion: A review of the literature. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 19(3). 162–168. 90 indexed citations
7.
Harrow, Alison, et al.. (2008). Ambiguity and uncertainty: The ongoing concerns of male partners of women treated for breast cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing. 12(4). 349–356. 26 indexed citations
9.
Wells, Mary, Alison Harrow, Peter T. Donnan, et al.. (2004). Patient, carer and health service outcomes of nurse-led early discharge after breast cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Cancer. 91(4). 651–658. 47 indexed citations
10.
Allon, Michael, Alison Harrow, Charles B. Pasque, & Mariano Rodríguez. (1990). Renal sodium and water handling in hypothyroid patients. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 1(2). 205–210. 38 indexed citations
11.
Harrow, Alison, et al.. (1976). Experiment in managing sociopathic behaviour disorders.. BMJ. 2(6043). 1056–1059. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026