Joanne Coyle

2.7k total citations
31 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Joanne Coyle is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Joanne Coyle has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Joanne Coyle's work include Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers). Joanne Coyle is often cited by papers focused on Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (8 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers). Joanne Coyle collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Joanne Coyle's co-authors include Brian Williams, David Healy, Mary Wells, Julie Taylor, Shaun Treweek, Somnath Mukhopadhyay, Jon Dowell, Annie S. Anderson, R. Steele and Stephen MacGillivray and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Advanced Nursing and British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Joanne Coyle

31 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joanne Coyle United Kingdom 20 1.1k 366 267 254 246 31 2.0k
David Litaker United States 29 993 0.9× 466 1.3× 203 0.8× 366 1.4× 142 0.6× 80 2.8k
Anna Nápoles‐Springer United States 19 1.0k 1.0× 369 1.0× 348 1.3× 185 0.7× 392 1.6× 25 1.9k
Arminée Kazanjian Canada 29 1.1k 1.0× 532 1.5× 216 0.8× 308 1.2× 334 1.4× 126 2.7k
Jennifer L. Ridgeway United States 22 842 0.8× 504 1.4× 196 0.7× 432 1.7× 191 0.8× 107 2.3k
Celia E. Wills United States 23 1.4k 1.3× 670 1.8× 241 0.9× 295 1.2× 171 0.7× 72 2.5k
John M. Westfall United States 28 1.5k 1.4× 960 2.6× 262 1.0× 471 1.9× 159 0.6× 138 3.1k
Anne McMurray Australia 25 915 0.9× 491 1.3× 576 2.2× 242 1.0× 223 0.9× 92 2.6k
Lorraine S. Wallace United States 28 1.6k 1.5× 527 1.4× 109 0.4× 290 1.1× 259 1.1× 116 2.9k
Amy B. Bernstein United States 20 850 0.8× 404 1.1× 395 1.5× 394 1.6× 248 1.0× 34 2.4k
Michael Robling United Kingdom 26 1.1k 1.0× 645 1.8× 174 0.7× 194 0.8× 241 1.0× 129 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Joanne Coyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne Coyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne Coyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne Coyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne Coyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne Coyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne Coyle. The network helps show where Joanne Coyle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joanne Coyle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joanne Coyle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joanne Coyle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joanne Coyle. Joanne Coyle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Smith, Karen, Chim C. Lang, Jennifer Wingham, et al.. (2021). Process evaluation of a randomised pilot trial of home-based rehabilitation compared to usual care in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and their caregiver’s. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 7(1). 11–11. 11 indexed citations
3.
Coyle, Joanne, et al.. (2021). Learning from remote decentralised clinical trial experiences: A qualitative analysis of interviews with trial personnel, patient representatives and other stakeholders. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 88(3). 1031–1042. 41 indexed citations
4.
Rogers, Amy, et al.. (2021). A systematic review of methods used to conduct decentralised clinical trials. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 88(6). 2843–2862. 50 indexed citations
5.
McClurg, Doreen, et al.. (2015). Clinician’s views on intermittent-self catheterisation and the potential for re-use of catheters (part of the MultICath study). Neurourology and Urodynamics. 1 indexed citations
6.
Evans, John, Thomas A. Oniki, Joanne Coyle, et al.. (2014). Harmonization of Detailed Clinical Models with Clinical Study Data Standards. Methods of Information in Medicine. 54(1). 65–74. 17 indexed citations
7.
Wells, Mary, Brian Williams, Shaun Treweek, Joanne Coyle, & Julie Taylor. (2012). Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions. Trials. 13(1). 95–95. 195 indexed citations
8.
Anderson, Annie S., R. Steele, & Joanne Coyle. (2012). Lifestyle issues for colorectal cancer survivors—perceived needs, beliefs and opportunities. Supportive Care in Cancer. 21(1). 35–42. 99 indexed citations
9.
Rushmer, Rosemary, et al.. (2010). Is the routine recording of primary care consultations possible … and desirable? Lessons for researchers from a consultation with multiple stakeholders. Patient Education and Counseling. 82(2). 247–253. 11 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Brian, et al.. (2010). Low exercise among children with asthma: a culture of over protection? A qualitative study of experiences and beliefs. British Journal of General Practice. 60(577). e319–e326. 38 indexed citations
11.
Guthrie, Bruce, Huw Davies, Rosemary Rushmer, et al.. (2010). Delivering health care through managed clinical networks (MCNs): lessons from the North. Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University). 20 indexed citations
13.
Hoskins, Gaylor, et al.. (2009). Engaging pupils with asthma in physical activity. British Journal of School Nursing. 4(1). 23–27. 1 indexed citations
14.
Williams, Brian, Somnath Mukhopadhyay, Jon Dowell, & Joanne Coyle. (2007). Problems and solutions: Accounts by parents and children of adhering to chest physiotherapy for cystic fibrosis. Disability and Rehabilitation. 29(14). 1097–1105. 37 indexed citations
15.
Coyle, Joanne. (2002). Spirituality and health: towards a framework for exploring the relationship between spirituality and health. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 37(6). 589–597. 159 indexed citations
16.
Coyle, Joanne & Brian Williams. (2001). Valuing people as individuals: development of an instrument through a survey of person‐centredness in secondary care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 36(3). 450–459. 75 indexed citations
18.
Coyle, Joanne. (1999). Understanding dissatisfied users: developing a framework for comprehending criticisms of health care work. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 30(3). 723–731. 47 indexed citations
19.
Williams, Brian, Joanne Coyle, & David Healy. (1998). The meaning of patient satisfaction: An explanation of high reported levels. Social Science & Medicine. 47(9). 1351–1359. 485 indexed citations
20.
Williams, Simon J., Michael Calnan, Sarah Cant, & Joanne Coyle. (1993). All change in the NHS? Implications of the NHS reforms for primary care prevention. Sociology of Health & Illness. 15(1). 43–67. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026