Mary R. Smith

760 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 520 citations indexed

About

Mary R. Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary R. Smith has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 520 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Mary R. Smith's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers). Mary R. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers). Mary R. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Mary R. Smith's co-authors include Anne Cutler, Sally Butterfield, Ian Nimmo‐Smith, Carol A. Fowler, Louis G. Tassinary and Sharon M. Collins and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Language and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Mary R. Smith

6 papers receiving 449 citations

Hit Papers

Phonological acquisition and change. By John L. Locke New... 1985 2026 1998 2012 1985 100 200 300 400

Peers

Mary R. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 360
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 353
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 102
  • Artificial Intelligence 90
  • Linguistics and Language 68
Christine L. Matyear United States
Ann Marie Jusczyk United States
Beth L. Hennessy United States
Satsuki Nakai United Kingdom
Judith E. Pegg Canada
Katherine A. Yoshida United States
Gwyneth C. Rost United States
Laurel Fais Canada
Rushen Shi Canada
Paula Fikkert Netherlands
Christine L. Matyear United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mary R. Smith
Mary R. Smith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mary R. Smith
Mary R. Smith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mary R. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary R. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary R. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary R. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary R. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary R. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary R. Smith. The network helps show where Mary R. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary R. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary R. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary R. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary R. Smith. Mary R. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 57
2 0
3 6
4 1
5 18
6
Phonological acquisition and change . By John L. Locke New York: Academic Press, 1983. Pp. xvii, 263. $29.00. breakdown →
437
7 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026