Mary R. Smith

760 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 520 citations indexed

About

Mary R. Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Language and Linguistics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary R. Smith has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 520 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Language and Linguistics. Recurrent topics in Mary R. Smith's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers). Mary R. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers). Mary R. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Mary R. Smith's co-authors include Anne Cutler, Sally Butterfield, Ian Nimmo‐Smith, Carol A. Fowler, Louis G. Tassinary and Sharon M. Collins and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Language and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Mary R. Smith

6 papers receiving 449 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Phonological acquisition and change . By John L. Locke New York: Academic Press, 1983. Pp. xvii, 263. $29.00.

1985 437 citations Mary R. Smith Language profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mary R. Smith United States	4	360	353	102	90	68	7	520
Christine L. Matyear United States	9	270 0.8×	276 0.8×	56 0.5×	67 0.7×	31 0.5×	10	374
Ann Marie Jusczyk United States	8	789 2.2×	446 1.3×	207 2.0×	125 1.4×	45 0.7×	10	901
Beth L. Hennessy United States	6	275 0.8×	390 1.1×	205 2.0×	85 0.9×	78 1.1×	7	524
Satsuki Nakai United Kingdom	8	301 0.8×	279 0.8×	100 1.0×	83 0.9×	85 1.3×	18	501
Judith E. Pegg Canada	4	328 0.9×	233 0.7×	97 1.0×	35 0.4×	37 0.5×	8	423
Katherine A. Yoshida United States	6	432 1.2×	319 0.9×	141 1.4×	32 0.4×	37 0.5×	8	511
Gwyneth C. Rost United States	6	380 1.1×	223 0.6×	128 1.3×	70 0.8×	46 0.7×	8	471
Laurel Fais Canada	9	271 0.8×	226 0.6×	73 0.7×	50 0.6×	37 0.5×	20	346
Rushen Shi Canada	16	996 2.8×	371 1.1×	268 2.6×	140 1.6×	50 0.7×	48	1.2k
Paula Fikkert Netherlands	14	454 1.3×	426 1.2×	171 1.7×	110 1.2×	149 2.2×	84	677

Countries citing papers authored by Mary R. Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary R. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary R. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary R. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary R. Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary R. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary R. Smith. The network helps show where Mary R. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary R. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary R. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary R. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary R. Smith. Mary R. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Smith, Mary R., Anne Cutler, Sally Butterfield, & Ian Nimmo‐Smith. (1989). The Perception of Rhythm and Word Boundaries in Noise-Masked Speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 32(4). 912–920. 57 indexed citations

2.

Smith, Mary R., et al.. (1986). Facets: Humor and Sarcasm. The English Journal. 75(4). 18–21.

3.

Smith, Mary R., et al.. (1986). Facets: The Place of Humor and Sarcasm in the English Class. The English Journal. 75(4). 18–18. 6 indexed citations

4.

Smith, Mary R., et al.. (1986). Using P centers to assess the coherence of syllables. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 80(S1). S126–S126. 1 indexed citations

5.

Fowler, Carol A., Mary R. Smith, & Louis G. Tassinary. (1986). Perception of syllable timing by prebabbling infants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 79(3). 814–825. 18 indexed citations

6.

Smith, Mary R.. (1985). Phonological acquisition and change . By John L. Locke New York: Academic Press, 1983. Pp. xvii, 263. $29.00.. Language. 61(4). 907–912. 437 indexed citations breakdown →

7.

Smith, Mary R.. (1978). Perception of word stress and syllable length. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 63(S1). S55–S55. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact