Mary R. Smith
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Artificial Intelligence
- Linguistics and Language top 5%
- Co-authors
- Anne CutlerSally ButterfieldIan Nimmo‐SmithCarol A. FowlerLouis G. TassinarySharon M. Collins
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers)Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers)Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Developmental and Educational PsychologyExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyLinguistics and Language
- Journals
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaLanguageJournal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mary R. Smith
6 papers receiving 449 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 360
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 353
- Cognitive Neuroscience 102
- Artificial Intelligence 90
- Linguistics and Language 68
Countries citing papers authored by Mary R. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary R. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary R. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary R. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary R. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary R. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary R. Smith. The network helps show where Mary R. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary R. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary R. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary R. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary R. Smith. Mary R. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | Phonological acquisition and change . By John L. Locke New York: Academic Press, 1983. Pp. xvii, 263. $29.00.breakdown → | 437 |
| 7 | 1 |
About Mary R. Smith
Mary R. Smith is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 520 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (360 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (353 citations) and Linguistics and Language (68 citations). Mary R. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anne Cutler, Sally Butterfield, Ian Nimmo‐Smith, Carol A. Fowler, Louis G. Tassinary and Sharon M. Collins. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Language and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.